{"id":"W2001223500","doi":"10.1063/1.2227382","title":"Calculation of zero-field splitting parameters: Comparison of a two-component noncolinear spin-density-functional method and a one-component perturbational approach","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Chemical Physics","topic":"Magnetism in coordination complexes","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Ansatz; Wave function; Component (thermodynamics); Zero field splitting; Spinor; Physics; Perturbation theory (quantum mechanics); Quantum mechanics; Chemistry; Electron; Spin polarization","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009734326,0.0001304241,0.0004326449,0.00004942004,0.00006045227,0.00002369135,0.0002070125,0.00005204451,0.00003387684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001327209,0.0001001047,0.0001162091,0.0001379217,0.0001533803,0.0001470741,0.00009407325,0.0002203752,0.000001353545],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004894622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005708505,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001094318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.345846e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979792,0.0001989766,0.0008361147,0.0001311125,0.0007191324,0.0001354917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972396,0.001128669,0.00102221,0.000155195,0.0004068798,0.00004743595],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002408393,0.0004080614,0.0003791888,0.00006237455,0.00002234276,1.851637e-7,0.0002848237,0.01762357,0.9728901,0.006701266,0.0002804068,0.001106791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007056761,0.0001144057,0.002033817,0.00006580343,0.00009660691,0.00002759128,0.00003395329,0.07265159,0.8862761,0.03787827,0.00001593265,0.0001002249],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6582868,0.00007888088,0.3410927,0.0002620945,0.0000703373,0.00008772981,0.000003680961,0.000005029963,0.0001127535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8720484,0.000001714703,0.1276264,0.0000350189,0.0002649629,0.000001643465,0.00000688396,0.000008278356,0.000006672532],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2137616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4082152,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04035411751578637,"score_gpt":0.3093385337752612,"score_spread":0.2689844162594748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}