{"id":"W2001287071","doi":"10.1115/1.2114949","title":"A Comparison of Contact Modeling Utilizing Statistical and Fractal Approaches","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Tribology","topic":"Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions","field":"Engineering","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Asperity (geotechnical engineering); Fractal; Surface (topology); Contact mechanics; Statistical mechanics; Fractal analysis; Fractal dimension; Statistical physics; Materials science; Mechanics; Contact area; Mathematics; Geometry; Engineering; Physics; Structural engineering; Mathematical analysis; Finite element method; Composite material","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00100846,0.0004192463,0.000632755,0.00155762,0.0003591533,0.0007023946,0.001236105,0.0009649226,0.001430189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004537557,0.0002744921,0.0007366328,0.001170513,0.0003539798,0.001659762,0.0004529652,0.0003319865,0.000344858],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006230195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006219272,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002181442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002114384,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990572,0.0001936623,0.00004260265,0.00007585993,0.0005734988,0.00005716724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966036,0.002094077,0.0001792103,0.0004848632,0.0005780126,0.00006032588],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003010715,0.0002672068,0.006809715,0.0004439526,0.000176373,0.0003645876,0.0006023273,0.7437684,0.04497347,0.05774493,0.00125391,0.1432941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004404073,0.00004458187,0.0006482775,0.000006134918,0.000007289906,0.00006843255,0.00002362973,0.9940598,0.002619074,0.001760535,0.0007454889,0.00001252297],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2100794,0.0009964471,0.7805203,0.0002229002,0.00004170141,0.0001070438,0.0001876897,0.0009704207,0.006874199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9320493,0.0006488419,0.06535627,0.0000359918,0.00002859965,0.0001462375,0.0001796255,0.0001623066,0.001392718],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002181442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005333364,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07924408459389143,"score_gpt":0.3226962485926501,"score_spread":0.2434521639987587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}