{"id":"W2001304882","doi":"10.1007/s00442-012-2438-1","title":"Is there an ecological basis for species abundance distributions?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oecologia","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Research Council; McGill University","keywords":"Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Species evenness; Covariate; Assemblage (archaeology); Biology; Habitat; Context (archaeology); Vegetation (pathology); Macroecology; Relative abundance distribution; Relative species abundance; Species richness; Statistics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003296916,0.00009662275,0.000107361,0.000009181193,0.0003208714,0.00001637421,0.0001824299,0.0001536874,0.01962368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001654436,0.00007970841,0.00005160266,0.00009140649,0.0002062282,0.0003461894,0.00007560851,0.00008240985,0.001093137],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001674056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000092258,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001025226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001423881,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991809,0.00005833426,0.0001306371,0.0001963891,0.00007114491,0.0003626459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994721,0.0002015979,0.00006195294,0.0001675085,0.000008755475,0.0000880844],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000120351,0.0002809741,0.9533209,0.00000162747,0.000005620026,4.137132e-7,0.00007169526,0.000007806076,0.0001933694,0.001964208,0.04364075,0.0005005949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000119918,0.0001494999,0.9356697,8.252915e-7,0.00001123637,0.000002132214,0.00006762451,0.00008701929,0.0003615331,0.000990746,0.06243208,0.0001076668],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9897671,0.000021776,0.001191384,0.001975572,0.0002859103,0.0002453454,0.00004976691,0.0000577519,0.006405391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930905,0.000008441798,0.002140922,0.001970532,0.0001090626,0.0001473018,0.00003209873,0.000005330712,0.002495781],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01879133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996846,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03245866618786437,"score_gpt":0.263446403858996,"score_spread":0.2309877376711317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}