{"id":"W2001398340","doi":"10.1016/j.mcm.2006.10.003","title":"Dynamic efficiency analysis of primary wood producers in British Columbia","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical and Computer Modelling","topic":"Efficiency Analysis Using DEA","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations","keywords":"Data envelopment analysis; Inefficiency; Restructuring; Productivity; Agricultural economics; Total factor productivity; Order (exchange); Technological change; Business; Operations management; Economy; Economics; Market economy; Economic growth; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006285788,0.000334395,0.0005924242,0.001396556,0.001213536,0.00190942,0.001162974,0.0005330269,0.003069283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002430041,0.0004541741,0.000397014,0.003121694,0.0005707668,0.0005930852,0.0005639185,0.0004774188,0.0003994307],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02154901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006457705,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9402689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9638978,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995078,0.00007609105,0.00002234267,0.00008240769,0.0001215604,0.0001897564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989604,0.0003804518,0.00006279255,0.00005563806,0.0004609578,0.00007976735],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007476258,0.0002927752,0.2704139,0.0002005986,0.0002399871,0.001045772,0.001200039,0.6499828,0.008647669,0.01318923,0.002839215,0.05120042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003180933,0.00007454495,0.4954384,0.00003903547,0.00008353241,0.0001195805,0.002763154,0.4915566,0.002567804,0.002731806,0.004525017,0.00006869027],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946037,0.0001176527,0.0009660708,0.00007437764,0.00000149301,0.00001874679,0.0005538812,0.00001354636,0.003650528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953924,0.0000798539,0.0004902172,0.000008313557,5.811549e-7,0.00001121277,0.000309854,0.000009964573,0.003697557],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05973113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1563498,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02905907351567712,"score_gpt":0.2705126062898895,"score_spread":0.2414535327742124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}