{"id":"W2001473818","doi":"10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.02.010","title":"Compressive response of tapered composite shells","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Composite Structures","topic":"Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Buckling; Ritz method; Structural engineering; Composite number; Parametric statistics; Shell (structure); Materials science; Energy method; Failure mode and effects analysis; Deformation (meteorology); Composite material; Compression (physics); Critical load; Engineering; Mathematics; Boundary value problem","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008791732,0.0003178676,0.0004810446,0.0002793029,0.0001013373,0.00003618334,0.000409863,0.0001294633,0.0005208142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009216761,0.0002930564,0.0001921945,0.0003658921,0.0001238452,0.0001415256,0.00008297677,0.0001950414,0.000009145419],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004568876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001324789,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003829027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005780163,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985924,0.0001141558,0.0004942403,0.0002678729,0.0002455546,0.0002857955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990082,0.00009236299,0.0001285694,0.0005090907,0.0001410057,0.0001207037],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008106563,0.00003395922,0.003747969,0.00009665283,0.0004232655,0.00002214721,0.002753466,0.07838457,0.909326,0.001060084,0.0009660273,0.002375188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009771297,0.0001376531,0.2484041,0.00007178353,0.0002480966,0.0000491928,0.00007356409,0.03568063,0.7105395,0.00219883,0.0009409072,0.0006785854],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9752219,0.001027647,0.01173391,0.0000101735,0.0004298162,0.0002151822,0.00005770653,0.0002708619,0.01103278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825737,0.00004120065,0.01713,0.0000461204,0.00006403572,0.000004338355,0.00005230202,0.00004767466,0.00004061524],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2446562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999521,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01046550303076565,"score_gpt":0.2048822292344009,"score_spread":0.1944167262036353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}