{"id":"W2001473818","doi":"10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.02.010","title":"Compressive response of tapered composite shells","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Composite Structures","topic":"Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Buckling; Ritz method; Structural engineering; Composite number; Parametric statistics; Shell (structure); Materials science; Energy method; Failure mode and effects analysis; Deformation (meteorology); Composite material; Compression (physics); Critical load; Engineering; Mathematics; Boundary value problem","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001749144,0.0002782617,0.0001575073,0.0001573243,0.0001484343,0.0002518508,0.0002622371,0.0003387117,0.001624198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008528953,0.0001382127,0.00009856298,0.0001140804,0.0005219785,0.0002673255,0.0003716218,0.0002428894,0.0001790705],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001681409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001398245,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006131306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009284464,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999044,0.00001405504,0.000001611531,0.00001133841,0.0000516461,0.00001688895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996015,0.000190187,0.00006004851,0.00002843283,0.00007776784,0.00004192769],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007501594,0.0001238925,0.001289847,0.0001272766,0.0000181685,0.0002979225,0.000216688,0.3028219,0.6760102,0.005504549,0.000463373,0.01237598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001813708,0.0001814821,0.002118733,0.0000126865,0.00000642113,0.00008390309,0.0001257199,0.9090952,0.08703925,0.0009128133,0.0003867921,0.00001880251],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9789443,0.0001094783,0.0109674,0.00007499736,0.00001660062,0.000008070883,0.00002845284,0.00005113746,0.009799586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964993,0.00004732135,0.001354958,0.0000168837,0.000004530591,0.000004900915,0.00002188792,0.00001016796,0.00204015],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001624198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0054335,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01046550303076565,"score_gpt":0.2048822292344009,"score_spread":0.1944167262036353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}