{"id":"W2001515351","doi":"10.1007/s10926-005-5943-9","title":"Predicting Return to Work After Low Back Injury Using the Psychosocial Risk for Occupational Disability Instrument: A Validation Study","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","topic":"Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Workers Compensation Board of British Columbia; McMaster University; Hamilton Health Sciences; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychosocial; Workers' compensation; Predictive validity; Medicine; Physical therapy; Rehabilitation; Context (archaeology); Back injury; Cohort; Occupational safety and health; Psychology; Clinical psychology; Compensation (psychology); Psychiatry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009013526,0.00148818,0.0009857367,0.001162828,0.00134429,0.001657469,0.001578409,0.002023297,0.0008672547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01783864,0.001026322,0.001633244,0.0006306022,0.001757193,0.001501126,0.00143485,0.002374308,0.0006912628],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009370583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001306818,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005938814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005432972,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972401,0.001271067,0.0002616734,0.000286565,0.0006826743,0.0002579485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881524,0.005918685,0.001534907,0.001255209,0.002186356,0.0009525052],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001967954,0.008523663,0.977855,0.00003738563,0.0002683658,0.0001289747,0.001427077,0.0003921098,0.0009871525,0.00006882003,0.0003348523,0.008008634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005915959,0.006774514,0.9880271,0.00003592997,0.0002035564,0.0002303418,0.001101326,0.001809654,0.0005651612,0.0001011434,0.0005258441,0.00003374917],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991442,0.00003313709,0.0002235047,0.00002871969,0.00001868826,0.0001778426,0.00007619245,0.000003977299,0.000293674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976337,0.0000928069,0.0007187738,0.00008107864,0.00002472085,0.0003446449,0.0005861567,0.00001098242,0.000507072],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009013526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04766864,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02743282653874345,"score_gpt":0.3683324606571979,"score_spread":0.3408996341184545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}