{"id":"W2001515351","doi":"10.1007/s10926-005-5943-9","title":"Predicting Return to Work After Low Back Injury Using the Psychosocial Risk for Occupational Disability Instrument: A Validation Study","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","topic":"Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Workers Compensation Board of British Columbia; McMaster University; Hamilton Health Sciences; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychosocial; Workers' compensation; Predictive validity; Medicine; Physical therapy; Rehabilitation; Context (archaeology); Back injury; Cohort; Occupational safety and health; Psychology; Clinical psychology; Compensation (psychology); Psychiatry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003568221,0.0002311331,0.0003750937,0.0002392056,0.0002931497,0.00006588244,0.0001411681,0.0001308679,0.0001463481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005863064,0.0001655597,0.0004412002,0.0006547676,0.0001816575,0.0006027331,0.00003076614,0.0003489048,0.0000123085],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008151634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003382992,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002072509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003244544,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962617,0.0005655477,0.001445863,0.0003395054,0.001145091,0.00024225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951705,0.002000565,0.0008625161,0.0003108138,0.001472038,0.0001836211],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01086356,0.001660537,0.967932,0.0002228445,0.0001156928,1.55219e-7,0.005166755,0.002635808,0.0005367965,0.00003256311,0.0003898765,0.01044339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002265599,0.002774391,0.9896038,0.0002754283,0.0001717424,0.000003758868,0.001623767,0.002266491,0.0000660366,0.0004779927,0.0003128617,0.0001581694],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9851709,0.00002647411,0.007068088,0.004066265,0.0005305329,0.003038757,0.00006379875,0.00001646004,0.00001871945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9549183,0.000001565212,0.04302964,0.0002368531,0.001568787,0.0001563923,0.00003579455,0.00002728591,0.00002533888],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03596155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7019059,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02743282653874345,"score_gpt":0.3683324606571979,"score_spread":0.3408996341184545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}