{"id":"W2001572404","doi":"10.1016/j.csda.2007.09.021","title":"On the hazard function of Birnbaum–Saunders distribution and associated inference","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computational Statistics & Data Analysis","topic":"Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":141,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Estimator; Hazard; Monte Carlo method; Statistics; Mathematics; Function (biology); Inference; Applied mathematics; Statistical inference; Survival function; Cumulative distribution function; Econometrics; Computer science; Probability density function; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03879382,0.001810422,0.004495193,0.005458604,0.001906919,0.003209646,0.005653595,0.003839187,0.008941271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1369509,0.001663273,0.003408788,0.005398647,0.008661213,0.007698506,0.004295389,0.007775175,0.0009973453],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00314215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004898288,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01115373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005480748,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9896336,0.007186295,0.0003309798,0.001297366,0.001052071,0.0004997107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8384726,0.1484992,0.003657805,0.004520371,0.003816798,0.001033257],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008624595,0.00007510104,0.002986487,0.0001687374,0.0001850819,0.0001850683,0.000565663,0.0620327,0.000236227,0.9001424,0.003139758,0.03019649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004574064,0.00003812418,0.0008796226,0.00007914566,0.00008997934,0.0001268695,0.00007780678,0.283699,0.0001626001,0.7131339,0.001620785,0.00004654273],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01178169,0.001289068,0.983429,0.0013467,0.0001387058,0.00006901979,0.0001583735,0.0001327816,0.001654692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4931175,0.009097492,0.4682954,0.001839685,0.002750468,0.00131292,0.001519592,0.0005884609,0.02147832],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03879382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2051638,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1075427135555125,"score_gpt":0.3887252636804368,"score_spread":0.2811825501249243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}