{"id":"W2001681570","doi":"10.1080/15287390490491161","title":"THE VALUE OF GOOD QUALITY DRINKING WATER TO CANADIANS AND THE ROLE OF RISK PERCEPTIONS: A PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Investment (military); Value (mathematics); Risk perception; Perception; Quality (philosophy); Business; Water quality; Consumer confidence index; Environmental economics; Public economics; Economics; Actuarial science; Marketing; Psychology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007916398,0.0002863235,0.0003482306,0.001521384,0.002274592,0.002565004,0.0007294613,0.0005011432,0.007285821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005472912,0.0001347947,0.0006599391,0.003255385,0.001248842,0.0005976922,0.0007975967,0.0007732902,0.0001286267],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03526512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02287949,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9876496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9900758,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993916,0.00007545471,0.00001515535,0.00004101071,0.0002151761,0.0002616874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973321,0.0007873377,0.0002468884,0.00006106774,0.001245243,0.000327352],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006610397,0.0002389257,0.7889041,0.0003117912,0.0001934712,0.0007108137,0.005959641,0.00978372,0.0008858393,0.1186391,0.008181128,0.06553043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003985063,0.0001075037,0.9398814,0.0001074093,0.0002297113,0.0001263738,0.01568079,0.01432783,0.0003405073,0.008535522,0.02055601,0.00006709525],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9528365,0.001557469,0.0005478908,0.004393679,0.00001007146,0.00008168771,0.002315719,0.000008551965,0.03824833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994951,0.0009670724,0.0002973716,0.0001016261,0.000008349391,0.000009172278,0.0004742898,0.000002581383,0.003188587],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03526512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2558675,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02188705204380512,"score_gpt":0.2367648981871635,"score_spread":0.2148778461433584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}