{"id":"W2001717498","doi":"10.1109/aps.2013.6711315","title":"Electromagnetic domain decomposition for 2D multi-scatterer problem using randomly distributed sources","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Geophysical Methods and Applications","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Method of moments (probability theory); Domain decomposition methods; Simple (philosophy); Scattering; Computer science; Computational electromagnetics; Domain (mathematical analysis); Algorithm; Decomposition; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Electromagnetic field; Physics; Optics; Finite element method","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005321666,0.0001084569,0.0001329032,0.00002369911,0.0000809814,0.00005760711,0.00007327029,0.00004049111,0.00008024484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004125762,0.00009267215,0.00006457225,0.0001039908,0.00001610908,0.00007628426,0.000009838195,0.00005460492,0.000042942],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002319197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003368662,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000440339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003784249,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994248,0.00001705082,0.000158296,0.0001270585,0.00004615371,0.0002266934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996809,0.0000874495,0.00001937594,0.0001138693,0.0000391698,0.00005924206],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004512364,0.0000504047,0.00003365275,0.00004337684,0.000021444,6.693896e-8,0.00004020453,0.002045814,0.9928055,0.0008332097,0.0005331581,0.003588671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004624546,0.000154823,0.01353596,0.00004385723,0.00009835802,0.00001030066,0.0001106318,0.8454893,0.08965231,0.04211527,0.003455733,0.0007089693],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4454906,0.00001761729,0.5535936,0.0001404328,0.00001326331,0.0005165049,0.000008786905,0.0001200343,0.00009918255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5036182,0.000001290764,0.4958048,0.00002914107,0.00004399806,0.0004013286,0.00003220251,0.00001732769,0.00005173226],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9031532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3779061,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01386944231250538,"score_gpt":0.2684966778607139,"score_spread":0.2546272355482085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}