{"id":"W2001717498","doi":"10.1109/aps.2013.6711315","title":"Electromagnetic domain decomposition for 2D multi-scatterer problem using randomly distributed sources","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Geophysical Methods and Applications","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Method of moments (probability theory); Domain decomposition methods; Simple (philosophy); Scattering; Computer science; Computational electromagnetics; Domain (mathematical analysis); Algorithm; Decomposition; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Electromagnetic field; Physics; Optics; Finite element method","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003646196,0.0005282145,0.0006338687,0.0003781356,0.0002016763,0.000490852,0.0004025593,0.000706652,0.00153606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004720764,0.0002451057,0.0005956548,0.0003739132,0.0003136969,0.0005466171,0.0006502976,0.0006623224,0.000478461],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001761674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004829885,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003875316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003702742,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998288,0.00006755366,0.00000620425,0.00001832909,0.00006478358,0.00001427415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997897,0.0001255279,0.00002036887,0.00001868547,0.00003439413,0.00001135676],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001563568,0.00009580183,0.0007026014,0.0004987314,0.00005775036,0.0003549099,0.0001981113,0.7419617,0.04947528,0.06673864,0.003163606,0.1365964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001119988,0.00002932475,0.00009258388,0.0000109927,0.000005306481,0.0001038983,0.00002056822,0.9912968,0.002409678,0.004187251,0.001824268,0.000008131566],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004065438,0.0001231624,0.9948867,0.00004451008,0.00001538454,0.00001093661,0.0000173975,0.00005719061,0.0007793293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1691334,0.0009369319,0.8252755,0.00007100247,0.00007308537,0.0001911118,0.0002501757,0.00008898047,0.003979812],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00153606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005138695,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01386944231250538,"score_gpt":0.2684966778607139,"score_spread":0.2546272355482085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}