{"id":"W2001741448","doi":"10.1017/s0021900200013097","title":"Optimal Sequential Change Detection for Fractional Diffusion-Type Processes","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Probability","topic":"Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; CUSUM; Fractional Brownian motion; Hurst exponent; Brownian motion; Diffusion process; Exponent; Applied mathematics; Type (biology); Diffusion; Path (computing); Step detection; Random walk; Detrended fluctuation analysis; Statistical physics; Statistics; Geometry; Computer science; Innovation diffusion; Scaling","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005914354,0.0009705343,0.001865951,0.001638582,0.000604833,0.001319336,0.00127605,0.001526042,0.0007374395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0231335,0.0005979995,0.0005366888,0.001205943,0.002167076,0.001516687,0.001485228,0.001207856,0.00009510353],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001448322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001602567,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003657053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001976112,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974056,0.001236475,0.00013545,0.0005284155,0.0004524686,0.0002416394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9797863,0.01723662,0.001244226,0.000420765,0.0008485995,0.0004634982],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001552052,0.0001774712,0.007117459,0.0002987259,0.0002114702,0.0005997778,0.0002911976,0.7418307,0.0120483,0.115758,0.001030669,0.1190841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001878062,0.00005965265,0.0005233388,0.000006210539,0.000008280611,0.0000311215,0.000009496357,0.9817116,0.001419633,0.01606732,0.0001321667,0.00001242213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.1392714,0.0004922534,0.8588485,0.0004019148,0.00005922113,0.00004723844,0.00005586954,0.0002076722,0.0006159532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8896977,0.0002582161,0.1089648,0.00008766729,0.00007876076,0.00007086958,0.0001143321,0.0000401848,0.0006874541],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005914354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03127849,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1605572059789987,"score_gpt":0.3984031357637293,"score_spread":0.2378459297847305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}