{"id":"W2001808193","doi":"10.1016/j.quascirev.2004.11.013","title":"Relative utility of foraminifera, diatoms and macrophytes as high resolution indicators of paleo-sea level in coastal British Columbia, Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quaternary Science Reviews","topic":"Geology and Paleoclimatology Research","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Foraminifera; Macrophyte; Marsh; Salt marsh; Oceanography; Diatom; Ecology; Indicator species; Sea level; Environmental science; Geology; Biology; Benthic zone; Wetland; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001364694,0.0004006132,0.0004090783,0.003305667,0.003364372,0.002777842,0.001107247,0.0005495331,0.00147158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004569242,0.0004342539,0.0001872317,0.005612684,0.001023687,0.0005116718,0.0009826631,0.0005554029,0.0002447517],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0252763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02115442,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9975258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994978,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993367,0.00009233286,0.00006836207,0.0001362915,0.0002254792,0.0001407603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943522,0.0006403308,0.0003020467,0.0001306104,0.003930202,0.0006445955],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003375467,0.00002769233,0.9537985,0.0001784042,0.0001611778,0.0001682383,0.002227508,0.001638024,0.002162217,0.000314123,0.002303461,0.03668307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009719643,0.000008914059,0.9948419,0.00007426771,0.00005259865,0.00003429485,0.001762964,0.000929063,0.0003455619,0.00005803751,0.00186075,0.00002212407],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9873967,0.003806116,0.0002003495,0.0004863145,0.00002060942,0.000021564,0.002724483,0.00002594265,0.005318049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922751,0.002259758,0.0007898776,0.0001017242,0.000005556852,0.00001360815,0.001024895,0.00001384567,0.003515601],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0252763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1833932,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0238898547887477,"score_gpt":0.257513651224879,"score_spread":0.2336237964361313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}