{"id":"W2001808193","doi":"10.1016/j.quascirev.2004.11.013","title":"Relative utility of foraminifera, diatoms and macrophytes as high resolution indicators of paleo-sea level in coastal British Columbia, Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quaternary Science Reviews","topic":"Geology and Paleoclimatology Research","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Foraminifera; Macrophyte; Marsh; Salt marsh; Oceanography; Diatom; Ecology; Indicator species; Sea level; Environmental science; Geology; Biology; Benthic zone; Wetland; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001867869,0.00009428009,0.0004198948,0.0001142589,0.0001741492,0.00002862725,0.000370442,0.00007690322,0.0005657682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003661181,0.0001044604,0.00003522816,0.0007137401,0.001592952,0.0004010698,0.00004548487,0.0002138888,0.00001904934],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004883727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006125211,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8840284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9945881,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979781,0.0003143846,0.0005545206,0.0003639226,0.0003797533,0.0004093093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991149,0.0002200592,0.0002537969,0.0002013293,0.00005682983,0.0001531076],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001458861,0.00001835542,0.9769456,0.00007137265,0.000003337314,0.00002107979,0.00009010031,0.000009659748,0.000004923848,0.00000963026,0.0001225665,0.02268883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001950077,0.0001263327,0.996253,0.0001057982,0.000005066272,0.00005421837,0.00005192591,0.002034385,0.00005812867,0.0002453834,0.0007733713,0.00009737806],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9908068,0.007252646,0.000007797973,0.0001395542,0.0000953332,0.0003322788,0.0001891306,0.000005885648,0.001170634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959688,0.003076702,0.0006954155,0.00005399945,0.00001220521,0.000002977362,0.00002906028,0.000001386325,0.0001594428],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1105597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6194766,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0238898547887477,"score_gpt":0.257513651224879,"score_spread":0.2336237964361313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}