{"id":"W2001829909","doi":"10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.03.064","title":"Optimization of a chemical leaching process for decontamination of CCA-treated wood","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Hazardous Materials","topic":"Lignin and Wood Chemistry","field":"Engineering","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministry of Environment","keywords":"Chromated copper arsenate; Leaching (pedology); Arsenic; Leachate; Human decontamination; Reagent; Waste management; Chemistry; Chromium; Environmental remediation; Toxicity characteristic leaching procedure; Pulp and paper industry; Copper; Extraction (chemistry); Environmental chemistry; Contamination; Environmental science; Heavy metals; Chromatography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002092642,0.00008564222,0.0003093639,0.00006113641,0.000008959132,0.0000140749,0.00009759238,0.00008035055,0.0000132036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006186939,0.00007612233,0.00005973412,0.00005081228,0.000009591206,0.0001227058,0.000003614004,0.00004172849,1.668433e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003171103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002015225,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":5.179695e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.91286e-8,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991803,0.000009402326,0.0005502726,0.00004751758,0.0001196241,0.00009291571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937,0.00002412194,0.000322361,0.00005996696,0.0001924382,0.00003113579],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005098626,0.00005004777,0.00001317783,0.0002726325,0.00003840483,0.000001809729,0.0001711814,0.01103708,0.9878113,0.00000965716,0.0001920444,0.0003516825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007265648,0.0001094559,0.00001975919,0.0001662575,0.00004944685,0.00003911275,0.00003792668,0.001054433,0.9975839,0.0001379258,0.000007038455,0.00006815763],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965637,0.00007677091,0.002873133,0.00002456606,0.0001282667,0.00008472378,0.00001623752,0.00001772913,0.0002148467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970492,0.00001777174,0.002762908,0.000005748589,0.0001320972,0.000001734815,0.00001038603,0.00001311989,0.000007067024],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009982647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3104179,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007662277065155047,"score_gpt":0.238217549149308,"score_spread":0.2305552720841529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}