{"id":"W2001845050","doi":"10.1016/j.jes.2014.04.014","title":"Comparison of three-dimensional fluorescence analysis methods for predicting formation of trihalomethanes and haloacetic acids","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Sciences","topic":"Water Treatment and Disinfection","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Water Network","keywords":"Haloacetic acids; Chemistry; Principal component analysis; Absorbance; Dissolved organic carbon; Fluorescence; Natural organic matter; Ultraviolet; Matrix (chemical analysis); Chlorine; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Environmental chemistry; Biological system; Chromatography; Organic matter; Organic chemistry; Materials science; Statistics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001379118,0.00009054173,0.0003017162,0.0001415674,0.0001232494,0.00001406848,0.0001315863,0.00003623316,0.0001082514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000635428,0.000064043,0.0001313724,0.0002757106,0.0005056459,0.0004816364,0.0000629952,0.0000444323,9.802168e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004929796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003939685,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003645278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001868282,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987895,0.0001015615,0.000482374,0.0001324744,0.0003674708,0.0001266462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989706,0.0002649893,0.0006310316,0.00006572438,0.000005908259,0.00006180307],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003994803,0.0001487031,0.857499,0.000009653915,0.00003706832,8.476548e-8,0.0002826538,0.005442644,0.1133276,0.000009827599,0.000007256308,0.0231955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006454165,0.001447876,0.7427907,0.00002276742,0.0003889647,0.00001267204,0.0002206299,0.08592245,0.1675217,0.0009020767,0.00003622713,0.00008848182],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.973561,0.0001254982,0.02599534,0.00003201835,0.00004812661,0.00009982195,0.000003688409,0.000002135851,0.0001323146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9511647,0.00001182378,0.04879017,0.000004920707,0.00001466886,0.000001816892,0.000001792135,0.000002452712,0.000007718994],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1147083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2611598,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02771383420666053,"score_gpt":0.3208747588590385,"score_spread":0.293160924652378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}