{"id":"W2001846555","doi":"10.1016/j.jfa.2011.09.004","title":"Strict limit types for monotone convolution","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Functional Analysis","topic":"Random Matrices and Applications","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Mathematics; Monotonic function; Monotone polygon; Limit (mathematics); Domain (mathematical analysis); Context (archaeology); Law of large numbers; Attraction; Convolution (computer science); Measure (data warehouse); Probability measure; Pure mathematics; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01011509,0.00148417,0.002006339,0.004375863,0.002541414,0.006812373,0.00240343,0.00338915,0.006432569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03555004,0.001568881,0.002643398,0.001992939,0.006666405,0.0126113,0.005273331,0.005220705,0.0007737306],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002986189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001755225,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001370786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001188811,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964818,0.001222575,0.0003491209,0.0004064437,0.001134604,0.0004055013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9679484,0.01985519,0.002594167,0.002173378,0.004419616,0.003009238],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002527277,0.00001191952,0.0002255921,0.00002111071,0.000009596029,0.00005514408,0.00008481896,0.0006720664,0.0003134364,0.9968274,0.0003015145,0.001452022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001820507,0.00001977213,0.0001645969,0.00001579218,0.00001114188,0.0001422597,0.00003986507,0.02097915,0.000221456,0.9777117,0.000655498,0.0000204399],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1854524,0.001957084,0.7722155,0.002929222,0.0006724031,0.0001069985,0.0002589524,0.000421749,0.03598566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8741266,0.002223484,0.07978097,0.001093925,0.00134459,0.0003608083,0.0003965509,0.0003750833,0.040298],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01011509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05349433,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.158811712468565,"score_gpt":0.3107804830645258,"score_spread":0.1519687705959608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}