{"id":"W2001880519","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2005.02.005","title":"Monitoring and information reporting for sustainable forest management: An international multiple case study analysis","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Ecology and Management","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainable forest management; Forest management; Environmental resource management; Adaptive management; Business; Scale (ratio); Sustainable management; Best practice; Certified wood; Sustainability; Forestry; Geography; Environmental science; Ecology; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007216028,0.0001578592,0.0001711215,0.0003400527,0.000419089,0.0001491135,0.0001628533,0.00004617521,0.0001066281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003842809,0.0001573589,0.00004731366,0.0002776026,0.00007093616,0.001976063,0.0005874921,0.00005568007,0.00003017561],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001105929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000145682,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006177269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004142529,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986442,0.00002594675,0.0005011603,0.0003232028,0.0001437835,0.0003617162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992924,0.00003272295,0.000323143,0.0002445382,0.00001752744,0.00008961239],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003967338,0.0001544513,0.9597142,0.00006192781,0.0004452897,0.0003837756,0.0007324794,0.0191215,1.079584e-7,0.006139782,0.0004587006,0.01274815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001180078,0.0001793857,0.9007106,0.000003216844,0.0005139578,0.00002707714,0.004353524,0.03101498,7.283042e-7,0.0003086066,0.06152399,0.000183852],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9843076,0.000006915811,0.0006839588,0.0001574362,0.00009337541,0.001448838,0.000002286567,0.00005300688,0.01324659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914166,0.00009127524,0.003804047,0.0001155618,0.00007037952,0.0004049212,0.00003741862,0.000008953493,0.004050806],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06106529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6416909,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01082782429680583,"score_gpt":0.2736895551696724,"score_spread":0.2628617308728665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}