{"id":"W2001932992","doi":"10.1007/s11219-010-9127-2","title":"Assessing the maintainability of software product line feature models using structural metrics","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Software Quality Journal","topic":"Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":132,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University; National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Maintainability; Software product line; Feature model; Software metric; Computer science; Software; Data mining; Software quality; Feature (linguistics); Reliability engineering; Set (abstract data type); Software engineering; Software development; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005266475,0.0005260176,0.000354077,0.002929323,0.0003030846,0.001190276,0.0007869123,0.0006885112,0.0004719444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03688634,0.0003397757,0.0007357453,0.001370569,0.0003302947,0.002294556,0.0006191192,0.0004808281,0.00009625007],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009958341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000711841,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005272509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005806211,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969836,0.001006345,0.0002480255,0.000271766,0.001378787,0.0001115022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9694603,0.01903373,0.004375563,0.003062344,0.003750993,0.0003170923],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006826303,0.0005423145,0.3294905,0.000175142,0.0005919965,0.0001282419,0.0005064209,0.431256,0.03117234,0.003090235,0.0005034279,0.2018608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000222572,0.0008544566,0.05446908,0.00001636108,0.0001433033,0.00007958245,0.0001073377,0.9339337,0.008235273,0.001855476,0.0002582389,0.00002496521],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9494597,0.00006852292,0.04956371,0.0000445672,0.000005346129,0.00002556347,0.0001133516,0.0002116811,0.0005076728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868902,0.00002456294,0.01274098,0.000003068656,0.00000314277,0.00001175939,0.0002237912,0.00001719727,0.00008528392],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005272509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02785212,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1178730492397492,"score_gpt":0.4112353565501069,"score_spread":0.2933623073103577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}