{"id":"W2001932992","doi":"10.1007/s11219-010-9127-2","title":"Assessing the maintainability of software product line feature models using structural metrics","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Software Quality Journal","topic":"Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":132,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University; National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Maintainability; Software product line; Feature model; Software metric; Computer science; Software; Data mining; Software quality; Feature (linguistics); Reliability engineering; Set (abstract data type); Software engineering; Software development; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007434753,0.0003698261,0.0005890381,0.0002547047,0.0006951986,0.0005364856,0.002140133,0.0002092455,0.000007778001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03063371,0.0002550683,0.0002934762,0.001253316,0.0003495319,0.002621786,0.0006128036,0.002463571,5.057668e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002215804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005882696,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002857804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006720199,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959363,0.001000191,0.0008600627,0.0005688756,0.0009779107,0.0006566467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918966,0.004127741,0.0009013147,0.001607731,0.001256767,0.0002098113],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000378135,0.0001158606,0.02504007,0.000406257,0.0001777286,0.00005615183,0.003165705,0.6592517,0.006631074,0.0118735,0.0001326432,0.2931114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007655829,0.0001392377,0.03856783,0.0001294997,0.00007912035,0.001806605,0.0006376865,0.05027962,0.008796374,0.8974959,0.0001932723,0.001109317],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.232389,0.000442923,0.7642813,0.0005441096,0.001806843,0.0001862124,0.000008585816,0.0003387188,0.000002222663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3230781,0.000007059948,0.6765154,0.00006986452,0.0002891102,0.000002525797,0.000001451705,0.00002228621,0.0000141808],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8856224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999902,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1178730492397492,"score_gpt":0.4112353565501069,"score_spread":0.2933623073103577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}