{"id":"W2001957949","doi":"10.1007/s12080-010-0094-9","title":"Starve a competitor: evolution of luxury consumption as a competitive strategy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Ecology","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Competition (biology); Resource (disambiguation); Outcome (game theory); Population; Selection (genetic algorithm); Limiting; Process (computing); Function (biology); Economics; Microeconomics; Ecology; Biology; Computer science; Evolutionary biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00107552,0.0003647048,0.0004325748,0.0006398722,0.0009911116,0.001666104,0.0007146179,0.001612776,0.002963661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002545261,0.0003063298,0.0003813225,0.0004510971,0.001312617,0.0012103,0.001437539,0.0009038196,0.0005028433],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008979107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004410481,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001832609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003869429,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996694,0.0001471084,0.000007753352,0.00007702203,0.00005242477,0.00004630327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990485,0.0002792105,0.0002119882,0.0001015796,0.0001016912,0.00025693],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006177083,0.0004861154,0.2173864,0.0003518359,0.0006098608,0.004606906,0.004282874,0.07220878,0.1752719,0.4105932,0.003829758,0.1097547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002076478,0.00120413,0.1820867,0.0001130696,0.0004025181,0.01229308,0.002896088,0.4672559,0.008832368,0.3067318,0.0175733,0.0004034338],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9694756,0.0004777102,0.01460845,0.0008305814,0.00001506308,0.000009923763,0.00002107805,0.00004401605,0.01451766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926412,0.0001882322,0.004850802,0.0001633231,0.000009187483,0.000008263883,0.00002351354,0.00001890716,0.002096506],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002963661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009914458,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01555226559921617,"score_gpt":0.2238037871279779,"score_spread":0.2082515215287618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}