{"id":"W2001983890","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2013-0388","title":"Branch aggregation and crown allometry condition the precision of randomized branch sampling estimators of conifer crown mass","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Center for Innovative Medicine","keywords":"Crown (dentistry); Allometry; Sampling (signal processing); Tree allometry; Mathematics; Estimator; Biomass (ecology); Statistics; Basal area; Larch; Sample size determination; Sample (material); Environmental science; Sampling design; Forestry; Ecology; Biology; Geography; Computer science; Chemistry; Biomass partitioning","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01725499,0.0003447939,0.000638508,0.0006930772,0.0003806919,0.0007501595,0.0006779059,0.0005552275,0.0004735929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04062773,0.0003021375,0.0005063209,0.0008293233,0.0008294497,0.0009947654,0.0004994629,0.0003695923,0.0002786655],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004606356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003587192,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003530814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009326353,"domain_scores_codex":[0.987224,0.008175074,0.0005904494,0.002442874,0.001306316,0.0002612757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9328438,0.04391618,0.006444609,0.01299471,0.003429852,0.0003708556],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001063862,0.0001451575,0.7941108,0.0001479662,0.0006943306,0.00007084134,0.0009291485,0.0192468,0.03286939,0.001551122,0.0005805381,0.1485901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009579189,0.0008794798,0.8706694,0.0000717212,0.0003930719,0.0002683521,0.0003052714,0.1068783,0.01567326,0.00292835,0.001740303,0.00009670187],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9364936,0.0007566678,0.06057138,0.00008203863,0.00002459322,0.00005604192,0.0001935636,0.0001835827,0.001638523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9738992,0.0001093893,0.02536557,0.00006409159,0.00001609344,0.00003127124,0.0002371698,0.00003748765,0.000239649],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01725499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09125423,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02163575524159103,"score_gpt":0.2955049214484091,"score_spread":0.2738691662068181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}