{"id":"W2002124584","doi":"10.1155/2010/329378","title":"A Mathematical Revisit of Modeling the Majority Voting on Fixed-Income Quadratic Taxations","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Inequalities and Applications","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Condorcet method; Voting; Mathematical economics; Quadratic equation; Distribution (mathematics); Mathematics; Income distribution; Majority rule; Economics; Econometrics; Inequality; Computer science; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007340597,0.00007435491,0.0002792192,0.00009747077,0.0001453326,0.00004448472,0.0001721378,0.00005058543,0.00006068467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002250199,0.00005760246,0.00009776525,0.00008820288,0.00006739004,0.0001152464,0.00002760925,0.0002575908,0.0000208018],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001373798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001466775,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003447601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008227833,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988699,0.00001187673,0.0008917934,0.00008819592,0.00003196892,0.0001062875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998752,0.0002558604,0.0007117033,0.0001788367,0.00004838662,0.00005321129],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003309782,0.00003857398,0.002252814,0.00005645176,0.00001868768,5.588627e-8,0.0003234102,0.0001857372,0.00002193848,0.9968359,0.00005590893,0.0002072197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002666246,0.00006543547,0.002143772,0.0000597535,0.00001739998,0.00001847726,0.0009112555,0.03565256,0.00005155613,0.9581023,0.002583984,0.0001268875],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9185168,0.0002603733,0.06317514,0.003406739,0.00009067464,0.0001984757,0.00009738409,0.000007487254,0.01424697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981318,0.00002980572,0.001268785,0.0001632087,0.0003141949,0.0000167131,0.000001199788,0.000007475539,0.00006684737],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07961501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.234896,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04377099562363639,"score_gpt":0.260340229671282,"score_spread":0.2165692340476456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}