{"id":"W2002196825","doi":"10.1016/j.jglr.2011.01.008","title":"Environmental history of the St. Marys River","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Great Lakes Research","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Wildlife; Fishery; Water quality; Enforcement; Wetland; Drainage basin; Environmental science; Environmental protection; Geography; Water resource management; Environmental planning; Ecology; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001611266,0.00007894847,0.00009420265,0.0007638504,0.001205439,0.0008983291,0.0003053958,0.0002836399,0.005217705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005211391,0.0001275708,0.00006671048,0.001309185,0.0006449973,0.0003823799,0.0008882293,0.0003797002,0.0004215253],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001280984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001031838,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1535701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4582531,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998978,0.00002690808,0.000005929451,0.00002663523,0.00002511663,0.00001752716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997563,0.00003077861,0.00003897383,0.00001245158,0.00009922163,0.00006230093],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001995398,0.0001025679,0.7539067,0.0003975251,0.0001044062,0.003981925,0.02843311,0.002239282,0.008789516,0.01661823,0.02835094,0.1568762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002161115,0.00001597564,0.8965681,0.00007461075,0.00000964923,0.0002785514,0.003642725,0.0002878632,0.0003306842,0.0004665453,0.09830853,0.00001461894],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9391987,0.001686602,0.0001553119,0.002923503,0.00004468544,0.000009376516,0.001601476,0.00002405822,0.05435631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833276,0.0009416892,0.0001406353,0.0001738647,0.00003711596,0.000006485846,0.0005972589,0.00001679412,0.0147586],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1535701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3053524,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05459915638210313,"score_gpt":0.2617382583094333,"score_spread":0.2071391019273301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}