{"id":"W2002225618","doi":"10.2134/jeq2002.1286","title":"Potential of <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> as a Human Fecal Indicator for Microbial Source Tracking","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Quality","topic":"Gut microbiota and health","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":134,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enterococcus faecalis; Enterococcus; Fecal coliform; Source tracking; Feces; Microbiology; Indicator bacteria; Environmental science; Tracking (education); Biology; Bacteria; Ecology; Antibiotics; Computer science; Water quality; Staphylococcus aureus","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004022635,0.0001332793,0.0002658748,0.00004162152,0.00009795104,0.00001285165,0.0001949516,0.0001476897,0.0001970988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000194256,0.000125125,0.000310228,0.0000183233,0.0001371247,0.000008166761,0.00006414299,0.0001450392,0.000006678236],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004270201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001592368,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007411921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004008459,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986814,0.0001101785,0.00066125,0.0001765393,0.0001570692,0.0002136051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990727,0.0000112166,0.0006234152,0.0001576236,0.00001395907,0.000121041],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000167393,0.0004915174,0.005386591,0.00004307401,0.00006317606,0.000002572813,0.000151916,0.000009364649,0.9908177,0.000005624003,0.001570813,0.001290243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004393719,0.002135782,0.0841449,0.00004398813,0.0001082456,0.0002823155,0.0004557608,0.000005345923,0.8567019,0.00004527447,0.05135914,0.0003236525],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977262,0.0004366494,0.001271846,0.0001332582,0.0001254773,0.0001578912,0.000112756,0.000001752946,0.00003417772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985111,0.0001005371,0.0003946238,0.0003866157,0.000344265,0.00000164943,0.00003166542,0.00001803043,0.0002115629],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1341158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5102448,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01757281824494151,"score_gpt":0.2879705606901896,"score_spread":0.2703977424452481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}