{"id":"W2002297280","doi":"10.1167/14.10.176","title":"Learning to read upside-down: a study of perceptual expertise and acquisition","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Vision","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Eye movement; Perception; Saccade; Perceptual learning; Psychology; Words per minute; Cognitive psychology; Session (web analytics); Reading aloud; Computer science; Speech recognition; Audiology; Linguistics; Neuroscience; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003539042,0.0002769674,0.000215111,0.0003874176,0.0001830398,0.0003056769,0.000133586,0.0002419501,0.002600258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001252981,0.0001423304,0.0001006073,0.0002007224,0.0004472383,0.0003463941,0.0002283568,0.0004236234,0.0004049586],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001539474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000222585,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001565596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001873452,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998589,0.00003106458,0.000009160499,0.0000448526,0.00003609766,0.00001996939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989762,0.0003867565,0.0002347391,0.00008160187,0.0001301415,0.0001905168],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003251378,0.01860859,0.6620719,0.0004035565,0.0001416256,0.002509337,0.01431966,0.000543209,0.1477178,0.000484856,0.0007155461,0.1492325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003727835,0.005251145,0.9888192,0.00001081187,0.00001841625,0.0007768434,0.0008247207,0.0003846611,0.002852622,0.0002182635,0.0007972214,0.00000888565],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993319,0.00006310236,0.00009211975,0.000009130463,0.00000120164,0.00001138509,0.00001510532,0.000002209197,0.0004738788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982846,0.0001026762,0.0002990112,0.00002059277,0.000005594629,0.00002008233,0.00005786505,0.000002499056,0.001206954],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002600258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008698702,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01594977338695914,"score_gpt":0.3429137751181877,"score_spread":0.3269640017312285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}