{"id":"W2002330963","doi":"10.1080/19462166.2011.637641","title":"Reasoning about knowledge using defeasible logic","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Defeasible estate; Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Defeasible reasoning; Model-based reasoning; Descriptive knowledge; Computer science; Non-monotonic logic; Cognitive science; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Knowledge representation and reasoning; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01259834,0.0009239599,0.001356585,0.003115632,0.003616328,0.01034439,0.003609313,0.003596655,0.004917816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02124836,0.001057829,0.002677524,0.002647573,0.009648617,0.0163344,0.007102264,0.004364644,0.0007966745],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003037191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002626389,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004072156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004614933,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9894878,0.005862414,0.0009680693,0.0008113032,0.002401959,0.0004685507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987575,0.008734955,0.0008704046,0.001620766,0.0007858168,0.0004130622],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002574874,0.00001792762,0.0001639166,0.0001081506,0.00005449231,0.0002768177,0.0007424374,0.01436604,0.0002197073,0.9748292,0.0009413628,0.008254282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002284494,0.000008110205,0.00004311216,0.0000574862,0.00001958217,0.0001076738,0.0001981375,0.03006515,0.0003567295,0.9576582,0.01144512,0.00001789543],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01300819,0.00106432,0.9565018,0.006751658,0.0001673677,0.0001679693,0.0001589998,0.0002974629,0.02188226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3516074,0.001346599,0.6398901,0.0008898005,0.0002404853,0.0003564161,0.0004317509,0.00009081791,0.005146522],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01259834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06662714,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1088828001548048,"score_gpt":0.3128346801907785,"score_spread":0.2039518800359737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}