{"id":"W2002330963","doi":"10.1080/19462166.2011.637641","title":"Reasoning about knowledge using defeasible logic","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argument & Computation","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Defeasible estate; Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Defeasible reasoning; Model-based reasoning; Descriptive knowledge; Computer science; Non-monotonic logic; Cognitive science; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Knowledge representation and reasoning; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003558094,0.0001324799,0.0001330553,0.0001321346,0.0001936138,0.0001002893,0.0002644485,0.0000509094,0.0000240434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001523962,0.0001283954,0.00005712185,0.0002934347,0.0000136347,0.0005788236,0.0001096164,0.00006344839,0.000187834],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001088933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000460534,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001500146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001054474,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988371,0.0001224634,0.0002835412,0.0003377583,0.0001907572,0.0002284162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993687,0.000033425,0.0001919433,0.0002241211,0.000108567,0.00007322209],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005863708,0.002131414,0.06938591,0.0004492805,0.0002872377,0.00007676056,0.062468,0.03733866,0.03096428,0.6020766,0.001872358,0.1928908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004988425,0.00008278702,0.0400178,0.0001192521,0.00001467938,0.0000225343,0.00006298265,0.9501312,0.003334389,0.00514384,0.0003119192,0.0002597687],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1253386,0.0002304407,0.8690423,0.00001597264,0.0006186712,0.0002943242,3.888967e-7,0.0001395641,0.004319769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.854069,0.000004931065,0.1457101,0.00005168747,0.00006257052,0.00001472849,0.00000535239,0.000008440327,0.00007320024],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9127926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5235811,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1088828001548048,"score_gpt":0.3128346801907785,"score_spread":0.2039518800359737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}