{"id":"W2002413229","doi":"10.1016/j.datak.2012.09.005","title":"Comparing functionality of software systems: An ontological approach","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Data & Knowledge Engineering","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Computer science; Software system; Software engineering; Adaptation (eye); Function (biology); USable; Software development; Software; Software metric; Software quality; Point (geometry); Software construction; Function point; Quality (philosophy); Software sizing; World Wide Web; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007802832,0.0006332292,0.0006532074,0.00963484,0.00193206,0.007088822,0.002571203,0.001677986,0.00187896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02525327,0.0005982196,0.002699402,0.005578896,0.004620921,0.01198543,0.003426857,0.001371692,0.0002946997],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002027139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003040523,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006202001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00455643,"domain_scores_codex":[0.992191,0.00305108,0.001186023,0.0006400142,0.002470171,0.0004617952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9826915,0.01051263,0.001027048,0.003561221,0.001749974,0.0004577295],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001662761,0.0002323683,0.01876195,0.0006292909,0.0002661223,0.0005868811,0.007017516,0.01403598,0.01252217,0.7852103,0.001115715,0.1594556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005457006,0.0003088634,0.01794397,0.0008485077,0.0009353033,0.0009294883,0.01106101,0.09883818,0.01260446,0.8239443,0.03238694,0.0001444259],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1664649,0.0005929579,0.8076092,0.001260496,0.00007145385,0.0003142417,0.0009699265,0.0006111232,0.02210567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6113967,0.0005047121,0.3848816,0.000166615,0.00003227603,0.0001869555,0.001641545,0.0001322128,0.001057315],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00963484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04126579,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1396288150849168,"score_gpt":0.3143660971102691,"score_spread":0.1747372820253524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}