{"id":"W2002467630","doi":"10.3758/s13428-014-0502-y","title":"Semantic properties, aptness, familiarity, conventionality, and interpretive diversity scores for 84 metaphors and similes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavior Research Methods","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Simile; Salient; Metaphor; Interpretation (philosophy); Psychology; Literal and figurative language; Cognitive psychology; Meaning (existential); Cognition; Diversity (politics); Linguistics; Expression (computer science); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Sociology; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002631841,0.0006036918,0.0006350895,0.002734079,0.0005182509,0.001683002,0.0003977384,0.0008218138,0.00487163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02726113,0.0001858173,0.001002456,0.001281401,0.000772892,0.002099012,0.001050721,0.0009755856,0.0008863009],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000457713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003919132,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009171776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001565287,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986888,0.0003053345,0.000242055,0.0001985709,0.0004402783,0.0001250197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.983414,0.01131794,0.001850557,0.001111983,0.001301655,0.001003906],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003729587,0.00187683,0.8597462,0.0003001414,0.0005060772,0.0003827412,0.009635285,0.001747918,0.01963558,0.002522655,0.001581326,0.09833568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001450042,0.001662844,0.9684415,0.00005899071,0.0002132479,0.0008366487,0.004793833,0.009890699,0.005187516,0.006853584,0.001828,0.00008815825],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963212,0.00006552141,0.001172548,0.00002632084,0.00001178003,0.00007589201,0.0003215421,0.00002927173,0.001975838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951547,0.00004575526,0.003031089,0.00001401722,0.0000117043,0.0002327525,0.0006625066,0.00002493161,0.0008225034],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00487163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01629722,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2521318354855341,"score_gpt":0.5103424258964011,"score_spread":0.258210590410867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}