{"id":"W2002467630","doi":"10.3758/s13428-014-0502-y","title":"Semantic properties, aptness, familiarity, conventionality, and interpretive diversity scores for 84 metaphors and similes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavior Research Methods","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Simile; Salient; Metaphor; Interpretation (philosophy); Psychology; Literal and figurative language; Cognitive psychology; Meaning (existential); Cognition; Diversity (politics); Linguistics; Expression (computer science); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Sociology; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007398142,0.0001874199,0.0003525927,0.0002649237,0.0006075717,0.0001058035,0.0002646935,0.0001705202,0.0002914235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001247376,0.0001545244,0.0001083451,0.0002247919,0.0008667881,0.0001515604,0.0006360695,0.0003789949,0.00001447785],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003643728,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002155274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001937066,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948602,0.003371632,0.0002558389,0.0006152491,0.000419024,0.0004780753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977055,0.001295648,0.00006903977,0.0003308686,0.0004112788,0.0001876783],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001542322,0.001370315,0.4257454,0.0007967566,0.000480405,0.00005041664,0.02850415,1.522238e-7,0.03583486,0.03942308,0.00171722,0.464535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002913757,0.001336796,0.9162977,0.0003081797,0.0007251347,0.00007557527,0.01515616,0.0005443481,0.01437247,0.04403945,0.003436405,0.0007940669],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9769268,0.001832565,0.01832703,0.0001491094,0.0003194083,0.001310483,0.00008276918,0.00005641344,0.0009954287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910442,0.00008789251,0.006900125,0.00007225847,0.00008872956,0.0005494773,0.00002576098,0.00002638425,0.001205202],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4905523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6301323,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2521318354855341,"score_gpt":0.5103424258964011,"score_spread":0.258210590410867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}