{"id":"W2002551708","doi":"10.1002/cnm.544","title":"Optimal vibration control of continuous structures by FEM: Part II—the computer implementation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering","topic":"Vibration and Dynamic Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Finite element method; Vibration; Bending; Beam (structure); Computer science; Optimal control; Software; Structural engineering; Vibration control; Engineering; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Physics; Programming language; Acoustics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003983201,0.0001357884,0.0002684626,0.000163318,0.00006256161,0.00002292372,0.0004319336,0.000067797,0.0001088836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006945706,0.0001279468,0.00005975017,0.000596084,0.00004791372,0.000134132,0.00008237506,0.000286636,0.000001542153],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007877714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000038197,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002446018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009935676,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988174,0.000223066,0.0005640751,0.0001180764,0.0001014397,0.0001759439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988374,0.0004419873,0.0000682696,0.0005905732,0.00002807702,0.00003365365],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001363855,0.00003181347,0.0005519111,0.00001329844,0.0000323904,1.75726e-7,0.0005554107,0.9518965,0.00162544,0.001102428,0.0002540321,0.04393517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003610694,0.00001905169,0.001014342,0.00001368013,0.00001554284,0.000001449723,0.000126079,0.9947321,0.0005023497,0.00005787775,0.003034047,0.0001224071],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00382154,0.001084993,0.9942027,0.0003215246,0.0001153346,0.0001897496,0.00001145819,0.00008498338,0.0001676727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6335716,0.0001749575,0.3660974,0.00004076123,0.00001633976,0.00005710534,0.00002134318,0.0000152047,0.000005272868],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6297501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5217519,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02261483485906373,"score_gpt":0.3282907130471431,"score_spread":0.3056758781880793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}