{"id":"W2002551708","doi":"10.1002/cnm.544","title":"Optimal vibration control of continuous structures by FEM: Part II—the computer implementation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering","topic":"Vibration and Dynamic Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Finite element method; Vibration; Bending; Beam (structure); Computer science; Optimal control; Software; Structural engineering; Vibration control; Engineering; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Physics; Programming language; Acoustics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003677974,0.0002853881,0.0004274374,0.0002458125,0.0001855048,0.0004709889,0.0005702866,0.0005439185,0.005895982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000982327,0.0002649816,0.0002418117,0.0001841637,0.0005990641,0.0004640117,0.0004754376,0.0005853248,0.0005860935],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002334851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003447845,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001357966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00112313,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998275,0.00004561345,0.000007369758,0.00002279291,0.00008255551,0.00001406718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997514,0.0001513984,0.00001116519,0.00004282108,0.00003630859,0.000006876895],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001464606,0.00006919159,0.0002973163,0.0001550308,0.00002731039,0.00005449811,0.0001030052,0.7167019,0.0195279,0.0670509,0.00144439,0.1944222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002318078,0.00002218931,0.00008079442,0.000009984856,0.000003818892,0.00001310315,0.000007166599,0.9895131,0.002649285,0.005473285,0.002199806,0.000004231436],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01260034,0.0001509418,0.9810272,0.0001020137,0.00002976107,0.00002443703,0.00002034101,0.0005955714,0.005449334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5367174,0.0003697762,0.4576637,0.0000836721,0.00004719897,0.0001925258,0.00007299521,0.0001794543,0.004673244],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005895982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01972401,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02261483485906373,"score_gpt":0.3282907130471431,"score_spread":0.3056758781880793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}