{"id":"W2002562194","doi":"10.1002/pmj.20259","title":"Exploring PMOs through Community of Practice Theory","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Management Journal","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"PMOS logic; Legitimacy; Knowledge management; Originality; Perspective (graphical); Order (exchange); Process (computing); Field (mathematics); Community of practice; Sociology; Business; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Engineering; Political science; Computer science; Qualitative research; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01947246,0.0007647386,0.0006871508,0.006017338,0.008178947,0.01061512,0.003563083,0.004617593,0.005996526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02243114,0.0005558348,0.0008153279,0.003590444,0.03886091,0.01594441,0.01160833,0.003469798,0.0004605573],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007860105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008564021,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00334902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003404097,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9700088,0.02498624,0.0004089567,0.001403543,0.001860786,0.001331653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.959218,0.03323467,0.001883256,0.00226481,0.001650913,0.001748219],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008914921,0.00009384356,0.001193872,0.0001108738,0.00001056458,0.0001936846,0.02811759,0.0008025136,0.00006044106,0.9552835,0.0006648431,0.01345934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005951286,0.00008882838,0.0008073054,0.0004229811,0.00001129071,0.000238362,0.04803281,0.005060266,0.00009416792,0.8965726,0.04859355,0.00001823811],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1333409,0.003724077,0.480534,0.03079418,0.0003622104,0.001172516,0.00008094611,0.0001502637,0.3498409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9439191,0.001011997,0.04996625,0.0008601929,0.00008380765,0.0009104122,0.00003300801,0.00002617893,0.003188986],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01947246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1029814,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.28346334647255,"score_gpt":0.3105302796599507,"score_spread":0.02706693318740072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}