{"id":"W2002580749","doi":"10.1023/b:qure.0000018497.06539.8f","title":"Construct validity of the RAND-12 and Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and 3 in type 2 diabetes","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality of Life Research","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Health Economics; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Diabetes mellitus; Type 2 diabetes; Glycemic; Internal medicine; Quality of Life Research; Construct validity; Quality of life (healthcare); Insulin; Health Utilities Index; Gerontology; Disease; Public health; Surgery; Endocrinology; Health related quality of life; Patient satisfaction; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03615107,0.0008941781,0.001325443,0.004330877,0.0008811749,0.003369798,0.001776527,0.002175688,0.001715486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1488853,0.0006858119,0.00460208,0.003319898,0.003035434,0.003375603,0.003246835,0.003444863,0.000320283],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002090591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001825534,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00623657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006010854,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9772487,0.0119378,0.002803099,0.001619057,0.005276835,0.001114454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8576282,0.1004756,0.02284398,0.006406816,0.009362582,0.003282863],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004961265,0.0002594602,0.9863011,0.00006979974,0.0006018058,0.0000346534,0.0008150877,0.0009890734,0.00004361254,0.001249158,0.0005108273,0.00862935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009166841,0.0004326995,0.9862614,0.0001872811,0.0003734582,0.0001502646,0.001140898,0.005469438,0.0001697175,0.004718603,0.0009407126,0.00006382421],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9874024,0.002541946,0.002064294,0.0009641249,0.0001622901,0.0001363684,0.001016245,0.00002696896,0.005685235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977239,0.0002962194,0.0008576978,0.0001317215,0.00003556499,0.0001148678,0.0006390954,0.00001395419,0.0001869124],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03615107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1911874,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7128462106268059,"score_gpt":0.534973183490157,"score_spread":0.1778730271366489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}