{"id":"W2002617243","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9787.2008.00563.x","title":"THE POLITICAL TRADE‐OFF BETWEEN ENVIRONMENTAL STRINGENCY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN RURAL AMERICA*","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Regional Science","topic":"Energy, Environment, Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental quality; Politics; Economics; Per capita income; Per capita; State (computer science); Livestock; Environmental pollution; International trade; Natural resource economics; Environmental protection; Geography; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001054243,0.00009787645,0.0001705833,0.0004432653,0.0003511325,0.001206011,0.000133368,0.0003395955,0.003515063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00308418,0.0001105258,0.0001465651,0.0007574416,0.001131681,0.0004626666,0.0005645124,0.0005165046,0.0001198027],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001069115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005418448,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009322159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01288813,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995342,0.0002242016,0.00001429506,0.00005322344,0.000054432,0.0001195832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954392,0.001981158,0.001920315,0.0000962236,0.0002463547,0.0003166713],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002211316,0.0002170757,0.9141501,0.00006421233,0.000151406,0.0003539994,0.0004836764,0.02375859,0.002747811,0.04399346,0.00160351,0.01225503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005374318,0.0001483287,0.960569,0.00002206884,0.00006188617,0.00009278809,0.001264345,0.01450271,0.0007350528,0.01938436,0.003147881,0.00001789683],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9920351,0.0001652692,0.0004686948,0.00120831,0.000002922526,0.000004472038,0.00008109766,0.000004401059,0.006029657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996415,0.0000645633,0.00003180924,0.0000443823,0.000005583091,0.000001472221,0.00002066293,5.620816e-7,0.000189495],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009322159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01853579,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02795905683433794,"score_gpt":0.2119673667441314,"score_spread":0.1840083099097934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}