{"id":"W2002635395","doi":"10.1097/01.ede.0000040256.22618.12","title":"On the Use of Population Attributable Fraction to Determine Sample Size for Case-Control Studies of Gene-Environment Interaction","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Epidemiology","topic":"Genetic Associations and Epidemiology","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Odds ratio; Gene–environment interaction; Odds; Attributable risk; Interaction; Population; Sample size determination; Statistics; Fraction (chemistry); Genotype; Genetics; Logistic regression; Medicine; Environmental health; Mathematics; Biology; Chemistry; Gene","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001659394,0.0001268645,0.0004842557,0.00003611751,0.00009555541,0.000001369591,0.00005850201,0.0001619836,0.00002878572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05187681,0.00009447113,0.0001335928,0.00004531996,0.00005575434,0.00000418219,0.00002071764,0.00006366987,0.000002251453],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004985392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000119936,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002084509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007231507,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979808,0.0008675983,0.0006077182,0.0002762485,0.00003894607,0.0002286976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877979,0.01128361,0.0004706497,0.0003103081,0.00009965553,0.00003784713],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009520771,0.0003289733,0.4846627,0.00007087564,0.001243501,0.000002592122,0.0001522893,0.3281292,0.1479229,0.005052748,0.02337842,0.008103739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005835545,0.0121539,0.6263498,0.0001147977,0.001065505,0.0004590767,0.00166573,0.02135959,0.1030202,0.06865432,0.1577996,0.001521961],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8616023,0.0001996289,0.1364925,0.0009296905,0.0001879862,0.0004534605,0.0001241614,0.000002949562,0.000007371307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9615903,0.0001116831,0.03668517,0.001283067,0.00006964066,0.0001321669,0.00005260854,0.00001158393,0.00006378522],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3067696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9561096,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.134131471886814,"score_gpt":0.351251145505634,"score_spread":0.21711967361882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}