{"id":"W2002648609","doi":"10.1177/0886368703251169","title":"Executive Compensation: Examining an Old Issue from New Perspectives","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Compensation & Benefits Review","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Executive compensation; Compensation (psychology); Business; Psychology; Executive functions; Accounting; Cognitive psychology; Process management; Social psychology; Cognition; Neuroscience","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009847029,0.0004490697,0.0008490769,0.006007558,0.003830376,0.0144764,0.001489248,0.01174385,0.005577685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02174843,0.0004169603,0.0006276969,0.004515313,0.01922787,0.02749734,0.002197681,0.01194147,0.0006383653],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004696479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00439616,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00321977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01069763,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961296,0.001610555,0.0002170114,0.0004580994,0.001186985,0.0003977006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9542369,0.03621098,0.002010813,0.001187222,0.004957621,0.0013964],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000341659,0.0001019086,0.001501845,0.0004108478,0.00002476142,0.00025451,0.002516149,0.0002993491,0.0001930851,0.8550031,0.06668586,0.07297448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002493548,0.00005316743,0.007348965,0.002156721,0.00005096121,0.00051919,0.006673758,0.0008698801,0.0001941906,0.5078869,0.4741723,0.00004906714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01059939,0.2754672,0.004491265,0.6468678,0.01110399,0.000009969857,0.0000582014,0.00001587172,0.0513863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.419524,0.2782636,0.004074077,0.1403436,0.1401495,0.00005515853,0.0001029,0.0001043408,0.01738278],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0144764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0520767,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1015747962184464,"score_gpt":0.2633780151215301,"score_spread":0.1618032189030837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}