{"id":"W2002728498","doi":"10.3758/s13423-014-0608-3","title":"Cross-situational consistency in recognition memory response bias","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Response bias; Recognition memory; Consistency (knowledge bases); Context (archaeology); Cognitive bias; Cognitive psychology; Task (project management); Trait; Affect (linguistics); Situational ethics; Test (biology); Personality; Social psychology; Stability (learning theory); Cognition; Developmental psychology; Communication; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002659263,0.0001475261,0.0004334957,0.0005530909,0.0001268246,0.0009054767,0.0004060891,0.000440188,0.001094641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01429439,0.0002305876,0.000287097,0.0005272499,0.0007161826,0.0008464915,0.0004696574,0.0006860672,0.0002282006],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002641316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002526168,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007076272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007263938,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999032,0.0002429038,0.000134892,0.0003270792,0.0002115406,0.00005156827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876398,0.007630556,0.001694032,0.001756126,0.001071907,0.0002075837],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004465801,0.0002754869,0.3942249,0.002135574,0.001941898,0.0006552765,0.001785734,0.0007155134,0.1064137,0.004576767,0.002181384,0.4806281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003771555,0.0002209901,0.9803535,0.00009895134,0.0004429758,0.001254697,0.0003024116,0.0005427361,0.009875375,0.003837941,0.002991957,0.00004068184],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9559959,0.03165853,0.005118717,0.0007576387,0.0003472501,0.00002524483,0.0002199034,0.00008034568,0.005796465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944144,0.003724584,0.0009259793,0.000174154,0.0002430021,0.00001205614,0.0001811682,0.00004255725,0.000282017],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002659263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01406366,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1071193083269598,"score_gpt":0.3419964826087426,"score_spread":0.2348771742817828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}