{"id":"W2002761213","doi":"10.1016/j.zool.2009.06.002","title":"Assessing the phylogenetic utility of sequence heterochrony: evolution of avian ossification sequences as a case study","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zoology","topic":"Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Alberta","funders":"Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Heterochrony; Biology; Phylogenetic tree; Evolutionary biology; Ossification; Phylogenetics; Sequence (biology); Clade; Evolution of mammals; Phylogenetic comparative methods; Genetics; Anatomy; Ontogeny; Gene","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006719354,0.00009738942,0.0001947467,0.00006417607,0.0002137667,0.000006456825,0.0002564065,0.0001610256,0.0006489506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001529035,0.00006678181,0.00004067544,0.0001731206,0.001202061,0.0001324581,0.00001320597,0.0002252767,0.00002852901],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000003562976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001614202,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01603325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06216689,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998614,0.0005129544,0.000317814,0.0002567566,0.00009375289,0.0002047754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990028,0.0003282634,0.0002299551,0.0003138904,0.00008480831,0.00004030089],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002116646,0.0000528821,0.9840483,0.000007965414,0.00001876233,0.00006892112,0.0003864026,0.00004461363,0.006969396,0.0001336263,0.000002311417,0.008245622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001352674,0.0003015648,0.9883794,0.000002341728,0.00002818602,0.002631784,0.002378271,0.003467305,0.0001946253,0.002402317,0.00001512281,0.00006383019],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970263,0.0004069899,0.0001950133,0.0001410678,0.0004339677,0.0002174175,0.00002084704,0.00001372596,0.001544634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99962,0.000005724499,0.0002777056,0.00002356421,0.00004250625,0.000003567196,0.00001554015,0.000001129021,0.00001032145],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04613363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.990519,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04303376369442573,"score_gpt":0.3080193816677215,"score_spread":0.2649856179732957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}