{"id":"W2002761213","doi":"10.1016/j.zool.2009.06.002","title":"Assessing the phylogenetic utility of sequence heterochrony: evolution of avian ossification sequences as a case study","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zoology","topic":"Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Alberta","funders":"Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Heterochrony; Biology; Phylogenetic tree; Evolutionary biology; Ossification; Phylogenetics; Sequence (biology); Clade; Evolution of mammals; Phylogenetic comparative methods; Genetics; Anatomy; Ontogeny; Gene","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01288328,0.0004203121,0.0003842115,0.003100606,0.001164727,0.001203443,0.0009658737,0.001037499,0.001418489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03502394,0.0001620121,0.0003924933,0.002177791,0.001991301,0.001340424,0.001402052,0.001060653,0.0001856575],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004830346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004131237,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001631142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003119045,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948197,0.004047534,0.0001598625,0.0004811539,0.0003442845,0.0001474784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9414055,0.05036149,0.002819402,0.002276366,0.002456198,0.0006810516],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001575029,0.0001433199,0.8308455,0.000298174,0.0006238174,0.001645553,0.005241366,0.008596252,0.04100309,0.01069001,0.0001797094,0.09915829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006170957,0.001970146,0.9066285,0.0001329212,0.0006844099,0.005959949,0.005308288,0.05049853,0.01052949,0.0139416,0.004203342,0.0000810475],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933869,0.0005959328,0.004052057,0.0001051343,0.000005243951,0.000008657877,0.00004745639,0.000005319227,0.001793375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968989,0.0001264609,0.002789587,0.00001466518,0.000006906721,0.000002840599,0.00004103123,0.000008304918,0.0001112985],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01288328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06813419,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04303376369442573,"score_gpt":0.3080193816677215,"score_spread":0.2649856179732957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}