{"id":"W2002768319","doi":"10.1108/13552510910997715","title":"Feasibility study of using statistical process control to optimize quality assurance in radiotherapy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre d'expertise et de recherche en infrastructures urbaines","funders":"","keywords":"Quality assurance; Statistical process control; Control chart; Reliability (semiconductor); Reliability engineering; Quality (philosophy); Computer science; Process (computing); Head and neck; Control (management); Radiation therapy; Medicine; Medical physics; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Surgery","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02883717,0.0006680249,0.0004724782,0.001464708,0.0005084501,0.001483769,0.0010712,0.0004384193,0.0008240184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06167299,0.0002431754,0.0004721665,0.001301,0.001076104,0.001178522,0.0007728306,0.0007138766,0.0001235908],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001157927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003139247,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002153531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009678197,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9683004,0.01951059,0.001042782,0.001679971,0.009048804,0.0004173882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9220861,0.05220681,0.007931086,0.006147503,0.01124087,0.0003876706],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003357542,0.00202217,0.05890753,0.0008424692,0.000250541,0.0001700735,0.001345877,0.1249984,0.06385147,0.02694702,0.001200815,0.7161061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005774259,0.01418789,0.03817912,0.000151584,0.0002993068,0.000213956,0.0004431378,0.8196625,0.109768,0.01095151,0.005438943,0.0001266334],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.268449,0.0003838521,0.7249415,0.000223287,0.00005926755,0.001117022,0.00007330553,0.0008632788,0.003889616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8267249,0.00007436461,0.172553,0.00003012214,0.00002504499,0.0002754535,0.00005761103,0.00004184725,0.0002176373],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02883717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1525074,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02742654696187762,"score_gpt":0.3865070156989061,"score_spread":0.3590804687370284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}