{"id":"W2002831740","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.020","title":"A review on China's pollutant emissions reduction assessment","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"National Key Research and Development Program of China; National Development and Reform Commission; Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China; Chinese Academy of Sciences; Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung; National Natural Science Foundation of China; Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung","keywords":"Pollutant; Sustainability; China; Government (linguistics); Environmental economics; Business; Plan (archaeology); Environmental science; Environmental planning; Emissions trading; Investment (military); Environmental resource management; Natural resource economics; Environmental protection; Greenhouse gas; Economics; Ecology; Geography; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007299787,0.0006273781,0.001513707,0.0001081017,0.0003302403,0.00004168383,0.0006430256,0.0005537214,0.05454395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002295331,0.0003780329,0.0006450588,0.0007022083,0.0004780511,0.0001413597,0.000568969,0.001104415,0.00406778],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002779908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008328601,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002799077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.289665e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964848,0.0006397202,0.0008414148,0.0008998049,0.0004855324,0.0006486953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980384,0.0001049011,0.0005682255,0.0007418338,0.000001936365,0.0005446942],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001039804,0.0006907451,0.0001633127,0.003188492,0.00003537998,0.00001664022,0.00001319326,0.000001821194,7.663839e-7,0.00005382958,0.02905078,0.966784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005884254,0.0003075892,0.008428742,0.003962519,0.0002581617,0.00003656016,0.0000144666,0.000001244481,5.689618e-7,0.0001696554,0.9863107,0.000450917],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005297011,0.9735214,0.000003270184,0.0003600173,0.000237829,0.002988394,0.00002994212,0.0001008326,0.02222862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0004410055,0.9959774,0.0002566884,0.0004661581,0.00007196888,0.0006962199,0.000068472,0.00003958667,0.001982527],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9663331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998671,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02911665054398614,"score_gpt":0.354646412153692,"score_spread":0.3255297616097058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}