{"id":"W2002872304","doi":"10.1016/j.electacta.2006.02.018","title":"Non-Faraday material loss in flowing corrosive solution","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electrochimica Acta","topic":"Erosion and Abrasive Machining","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Faraday cage; Anode; Slurry; Cathodic protection; Materials science; Corrosion; Current density; Current (fluid); Carbon steel; Composite material; Chemistry; Metallurgy; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Magnetic field; Thermodynamics; Electrode; Chromatography; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000124058,0.0001392995,0.0001340588,0.00004366535,0.0001314003,0.00003893697,0.0001873106,0.00006418111,0.0009534004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001275635,0.0001339866,0.00004420411,0.0001919254,0.00005963621,0.0001766558,0.0001052923,0.0001756317,0.0002183946],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001924234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009995359,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000371942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00056311,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988635,0.00003643666,0.0001948447,0.000290328,0.0001935148,0.0004214355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997566,0.00002032654,0.00003870082,0.0001365194,0.000002822185,0.00004498283],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003129023,0.00003806649,0.03651186,0.000001580469,8.403435e-7,0.000007086034,0.0000707356,0.00005703361,0.9604408,0.00003552717,0.002629572,0.0001756695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000590098,0.00008178092,0.3939336,0.00002289614,0.000006224388,0.00002036903,0.00001441402,0.002213829,0.6003743,0.0005070797,0.001940867,0.0002945546],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9897069,0.000004467266,0.0003092043,0.0004281911,0.0001836274,0.0001315972,0.00000277137,0.00004240294,0.009190776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988438,0.000004117799,0.0003560354,0.0002753677,0.0001086523,0.00001168574,0.00002909835,0.00001652642,0.0003547122],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3600664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999599,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.003608067311371108,"score_gpt":0.2012140420719124,"score_spread":0.1976059747605413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}