{"id":"W2003029010","doi":"10.1139/x06-094","title":"The economics of using forests to increase carbon storage","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Forest Service","keywords":"Carbon sequestration; Valuation (finance); Profitability index; Greenhouse gas; Carbon fibers; Climate change; Environmental science; Kyoto Protocol; Carbon accounting; Forest management; Work (physics); Natural resource economics; Economics; Ecology; Carbon dioxide; Agroforestry; Computer science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001541939,0.00007785079,0.0001178685,0.0003134775,0.0002791928,0.00008537198,0.0005998667,0.00003918189,0.0002130725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001677894,0.00005952751,0.0000596895,0.000415472,0.0004109924,0.0001208318,0.00008704149,0.0002185574,0.00005014117],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005786899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003939947,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3907828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8631855,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986842,0.0000989523,0.0003005166,0.0000976537,0.0002848814,0.0005338516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989767,0.0001156957,0.0001077334,0.0002394846,0.00005568897,0.0005046703],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003819462,0.00001152694,0.9067893,0.000006468227,0.00001143384,0.00007310924,0.0001405476,0.0617984,0.00007591494,0.003857438,0.02590166,0.001295985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000368526,0.0002812648,0.8406978,0.00004258748,0.00001279324,0.0000402809,0.00007511875,0.005706965,0.0001114896,0.007204499,0.1452996,0.0001591249],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9718833,0.00008603813,0.000006514059,0.0006368071,0.0000966429,0.0001504199,0.000005159302,0.000001070458,0.02713405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976572,0.000008968787,0.0001238716,0.00002735633,0.0001749872,0.000001625865,7.539925e-7,0.00001281791,0.001992459],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4724027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.613274,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0316980909273184,"score_gpt":0.290008113532294,"score_spread":0.2583100226049756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}