{"id":"W2003104238","doi":"10.1115/imece2009-12765","title":"Design, Analysis and Optimization of Magnetic Microactuators","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Chemical and Physical Properties of Materials","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Microactuator; Electromagnetic coil; Microelectromechanical systems; Magnetic flux; Magnetic field; Mechanical engineering; Magnet; Materials science; Fabrication; Deflection (physics); Actuator; Computer science; Engineering; Electronic engineering; Electrical engineering; Nanotechnology; Physics; Optics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003021015,0.0003990318,0.0004380744,0.0002773913,0.0002332172,0.0006555904,0.0004031874,0.0003809967,0.0006968055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004716156,0.0002831562,0.0002016565,0.000225045,0.0002273677,0.0002741056,0.0002074079,0.0002748666,0.000276298],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003910157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005514181,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004519383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007125231,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997699,0.00002377426,0.00001056851,0.00003725207,0.0001333799,0.00002514927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998401,0.0000430482,0.00004317492,0.00001261358,0.00005208873,0.000008915395],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002031219,0.0000999625,0.001497512,0.0007272483,0.00005543551,0.000253745,0.00009953271,0.3642733,0.5368805,0.008755052,0.001180565,0.08597416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000529081,0.0005765857,0.002340996,0.00003501214,0.00006920229,0.000170342,0.00006135054,0.7556127,0.2244931,0.001549449,0.01500923,0.00002898757],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4372801,0.007436733,0.5192259,0.0006163152,0.0001935338,0.0003367104,0.0002287092,0.0009200347,0.03376194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8561216,0.001614679,0.1369714,0.00005356695,0.00003735145,0.0002502377,0.00009645167,0.00005960378,0.004795207],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0006968055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.002837062,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01271668061155906,"score_gpt":0.2105101101560355,"score_spread":0.1977934295444764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}