{"id":"W2003109379","doi":"10.1177/1077727x07312190","title":"Conceptualizing Immoral and Unethical Consumption Using Neutralization Theory","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Immorality; Consumption (sociology); Scholarship; Neutralization; Purchasing; Perspective (graphical); Social psychology; Consumer behaviour; Sociology; Psychology; Criminology; Law and economics; Business; Marketing; Political science; Law; Morality; Social science; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02366834,0.0001124721,0.0001922861,0.000587108,0.004041744,0.001128347,0.0004679201,0.0001384464,0.0001280995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005292756,0.00007883808,0.00003595019,0.001107582,0.006815032,0.0011121,0.0001893251,0.0008764261,0.00002197747],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003827717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008398344,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008520748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001449564,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9946154,0.001801901,0.0005021539,0.0004491953,0.002168033,0.0004633674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937297,0.004474306,0.0001727219,0.0001756191,0.001167372,0.000280358],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001335059,0.00009274643,0.7053839,0.00002504018,0.00002621798,0.00006556136,0.01210624,0.0004108479,0.006771797,0.2279246,0.002649106,0.04441046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008154413,0.0002319788,0.5195593,0.0002078232,0.00001768855,0.002563555,0.02366276,0.02104128,0.000258001,0.4276392,0.003607389,0.0003955987],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9826711,0.007192472,0.007990214,0.0009384865,0.0005398236,0.0000948711,0.000002260845,0.000009766501,0.0005609933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913256,0.006327146,0.00174142,0.0002762547,0.0001391139,0.000002489002,5.41768e-7,0.000005232288,0.0001821578],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1997146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999086,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7775366269256863,"score_gpt":0.5655220230368824,"score_spread":0.2120146038888039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}