{"id":"W2003116546","doi":"10.1016/j.emj.2011.03.001","title":"Impacts of collaboration and network indicators on patent quality: The case of Canadian nanotechnology innovation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Management Journal","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Proxy (statistics); Quality (philosophy); Business; Industrial organization; Marketing; Knowledge management; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004268692,0.0002483373,0.0005034546,0.004146567,0.005382783,0.006235098,0.00150914,0.002280881,0.009675208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0325997,0.0001441736,0.0005266286,0.005980684,0.003671277,0.00285182,0.002406737,0.001928722,0.0002681127],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03608958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02415182,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9131625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9404318,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972155,0.0005165397,0.00009741687,0.0001933984,0.0007612378,0.001215921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9581667,0.0225578,0.00553087,0.0007570686,0.008193562,0.004794123],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001069173,0.0005100535,0.7185726,0.0002220499,0.0004213866,0.003675475,0.007201861,0.04256764,0.001835742,0.1584775,0.009274673,0.05617199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002393283,0.0002217052,0.8786901,0.000177432,0.0007608893,0.0004968581,0.03240179,0.04066364,0.00154092,0.02670431,0.01788048,0.000222456],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9551588,0.0005901256,0.0003492937,0.003766488,0.00001146506,0.00002807377,0.0003152689,0.00001495669,0.03976541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998524,0.0001170421,0.00007948765,0.00003842331,0.000004908278,0.000002835597,0.00005318284,0.000002095887,0.001178056],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9958534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2618495,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.14180342723665,"score_gpt":0.2373392489535418,"score_spread":0.09553582171689184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}