{"id":"W2003185577","doi":"10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00649.x","title":"An Interagency Comparison of Screening‐Level Risk Assessment Approaches","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Risk Analysis","topic":"Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Risk assessment; International agency; Exposure assessment; Environmental health; Regulatory agency; Agency (philosophy); Risk analysis (engineering); Statistics; Cancer; Medicine; Computer science; Political science; Mathematics; Sociology; Computer security; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.120983,0.0009835487,0.0009312814,0.007002018,0.001341037,0.00623122,0.003296963,0.001392708,0.003926179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.119397,0.000663164,0.002037163,0.005855179,0.001920939,0.003274034,0.004861692,0.002152273,0.001156151],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006598975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007029676,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006311989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009146097,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8998101,0.06038683,0.004664726,0.00330154,0.03013649,0.001700156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8422039,0.08634124,0.006298425,0.009803857,0.05429574,0.00105696],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001625328,0.0009785583,0.06541524,0.001718031,0.001743527,0.0002216059,0.00781533,0.05318493,0.005600852,0.09113041,0.007890194,0.7626761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001122103,0.006889797,0.4143687,0.003496061,0.003396374,0.001265625,0.01978895,0.1834159,0.02894254,0.1581402,0.1782886,0.0008851539],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2762222,0.009314896,0.4446222,0.007725642,0.0004149086,0.004184257,0.00151644,0.001449118,0.2545503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7654057,0.004098772,0.2174143,0.001187947,0.000103029,0.002886508,0.001493302,0.0003297884,0.00708066],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.120983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.639827,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04623298816865665,"score_gpt":0.3401448765239285,"score_spread":0.2939118883552718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}