{"id":"W2003199334","doi":"10.1108/ajim-11-2013-0127","title":"A multidimensional analysis of Aslib proceedings – using everything but the impact factor","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aslib Journal of Information Management","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Originality; Strengths and weaknesses; Citation; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Value (mathematics); Citation impact; Citation analysis; Data science; Library science; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Social science; Law; Qualitative research; Social psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0192838,0.0001227039,0.0003804591,0.04843101,0.0001975626,0.001139043,0.001369883,0.00004772501,0.0002796827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005074259,0.00006202102,0.0004641667,0.07159331,0.00006683101,0.003247347,0.0004163671,0.0002045042,0.00002862663],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001479939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007418356,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004875846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.84482e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9908152,0.00009012988,0.001573586,0.0001192552,0.00710962,0.000292171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920178,0.001102485,0.002087176,0.0002545759,0.004347492,0.0001904587],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002476068,0.000270635,0.2561871,0.00006187118,0.003538486,0.000005724511,0.004104924,0.1401965,0.001326254,0.01086224,0.01356359,0.569635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005258638,0.000155772,0.4893024,0.00002312784,0.0001739483,0.00001021794,0.002347544,0.4987309,0.0003122496,0.0009944327,0.007313857,0.0001096932],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.893038,0.00004043939,0.1038529,0.000265485,0.0001596758,0.0001549639,0.00001087065,0.000004393451,0.002473183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990995,0.00004175266,0.008693502,0.0001296519,0.00003399656,8.191119e-7,0.000001634374,0.000003369419,0.0001002123],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5695254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998979,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3448193613516742,"score_gpt":0.5221124057526471,"score_spread":0.1772930444009729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}