{"id":"W2003199334","doi":"10.1108/ajim-11-2013-0127","title":"A multidimensional analysis of Aslib proceedings – using everything but the impact factor","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aslib Journal of Information Management","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Originality; Strengths and weaknesses; Citation; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Value (mathematics); Citation impact; Citation analysis; Data science; Library science; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Social science; Law; Qualitative research; Social psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01457422,0.0007737438,0.0008678028,0.04085487,0.001651811,0.008796259,0.0005587614,0.0005420092,0.006273436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04792025,0.0001727942,0.001186702,0.03593105,0.001783219,0.004335833,0.002496818,0.0009277778,0.0008249961],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002323784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002817669,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001554244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001240411,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9830593,0.005059824,0.001989745,0.0008535424,0.008597993,0.0004396355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9415221,0.02782303,0.01044841,0.003512084,0.01504278,0.001651656],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000561509,0.0005817932,0.261728,0.00495437,0.0009298589,0.0006038147,0.01933276,0.002823516,0.008001667,0.0709055,0.0188677,0.6107095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000598912,0.001097835,0.7776709,0.001597099,0.0005930852,0.001345498,0.03354542,0.01367415,0.007480188,0.05030896,0.1122724,0.0003546198],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.764916,0.005431175,0.08616781,0.003214972,0.0007298798,0.002089802,0.008301587,0.00104577,0.1281031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9323214,0.001414011,0.0588419,0.0001577197,0.0003064419,0.00110058,0.002288368,0.0001520723,0.003417424],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9854258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07707673,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3448193613516742,"score_gpt":0.5221124057526471,"score_spread":0.1772930444009729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}