{"id":"W2003200607","doi":"10.1087/095315108x323884","title":"Peer review and its contribution to manuscript quality: an Australian perspective","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Learned Publishing","topic":"Academic Writing and Publishing","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Seniority; Perspective (graphical); Obligation; Incentive; Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Medical education; Peer review; Public relations; Political science; Medicine; Computer science; Law; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2021645,0.0008021547,0.002385099,0.007695494,0.009127457,0.03002032,0.004441062,0.00925462,0.004513232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3977452,0.001113237,0.0007979103,0.006862276,0.02962048,0.009270872,0.01070818,0.008145932,0.0006501423],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01685235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05937903,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02680565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0201303,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7246143,0.1676991,0.02063021,0.005518207,0.07589967,0.005638456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3629808,0.4259011,0.05149921,0.01354278,0.1255631,0.0205129],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004059243,0.0003816035,0.02489924,0.01295694,0.0005697578,0.003532917,0.1968957,0.002152283,0.00238047,0.300338,0.06371587,0.3917713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001737082,0.001672585,0.08620015,0.02416761,0.0005536707,0.005873849,0.08110577,0.004534766,0.001950955,0.2141621,0.5789748,0.0006299707],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0443459,0.200689,0.009955841,0.6271627,0.00845779,0.0002892606,0.00006181705,0.0001002598,0.1089375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7731143,0.1642617,0.01109753,0.02543504,0.01111791,0.0002609621,0.00002764999,0.000110435,0.01457452],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7978355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9838732,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1747129213561869,"score_gpt":0.3464775091560509,"score_spread":0.171764587799864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}