{"id":"W2003200607","doi":"10.1087/095315108x323884","title":"Peer review and its contribution to manuscript quality: an Australian perspective","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Learned Publishing","topic":"Academic Writing and Publishing","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Seniority; Perspective (graphical); Obligation; Incentive; Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Medical education; Peer review; Public relations; Political science; Medicine; Computer science; Law; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003205534,0.0002057124,0.0003644998,0.0001573437,0.0008952382,0.002859025,0.0003926842,0.0001494365,0.0009604542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009050106,0.0001952073,0.00006796879,0.0001426095,0.00009582598,0.008061342,0.0001151391,0.0009532584,0.00009727218],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001275416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006333656,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002295291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003220838,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975984,0.0002965272,0.0003954285,0.0004973026,0.000719495,0.0004928547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970986,0.00009865843,0.0001645031,0.0002302827,0.002060479,0.0003475293],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001100877,0.00002459663,0.0001993822,0.00008933433,0.00002198127,0.000008532917,0.03551,0.000001653637,0.00002698706,0.5856577,0.3777183,0.0007305849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002854458,0.00004460442,0.0009386779,0.0002326765,0.00004621133,0.00003624084,0.0167017,0.0000166498,0.00001854584,0.002636199,0.9787071,0.0003359275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1402425,0.009756706,0.00003281408,0.6823065,0.0008757374,0.0007962251,0.0002090464,0.0006377572,0.1651427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8511885,0.0003371543,0.00008829818,0.01636509,0.001908045,0.00003203276,0.0001792012,0.0000346864,0.129867],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.710946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999528,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1747129213561869,"score_gpt":0.3464775091560509,"score_spread":0.171764587799864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}