{"id":"W2003230226","doi":"10.1080/02827581.2011.624116","title":"A fine-scale model for area-based predictions of tree-size-related attributes derived from LiDAR canopy heights","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Norges Miljø- og Biovitenskapelige Universitet","keywords":"Lidar; Basal area; Canopy; Allometry; Ranging; Scale (ratio); Statistics; Mathematics; Tree (set theory); Forest inventory; Variance (accounting); Remote sensing; Cartography; Geography; Forest management; Forestry; Ecology; Geodesy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007619241,0.0001378957,0.0002788202,0.0001645878,0.000318653,0.00002669512,0.0004503933,0.0001181378,0.0003364004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001554019,0.0001106991,0.0002000311,0.0004991351,0.0005685214,0.0001495124,0.00006104414,0.0003841784,0.00001861129],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002122977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001525023,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001122746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002837484,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980471,0.0001135776,0.0005375386,0.0002395639,0.0006435185,0.000418734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998499,0.0003526291,0.0002631658,0.0003558626,0.0002221043,0.0003072839],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002023023,0.001752662,0.8066221,0.00005667827,0.0003361769,0.00005104082,0.01108014,0.04679419,0.1078612,0.0002840445,0.0121615,0.01097721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003076459,0.001359769,0.6407285,0.0003705739,0.0001243239,0.00003969575,0.0004000826,0.2677999,0.05734053,0.02806238,0.0003913139,0.0003064649],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9612433,0.00006796173,0.03555973,0.0003451921,0.00006075982,0.0003595646,0.000139805,0.00001307769,0.002210567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9826393,0.00001348863,0.01674019,0.000007272757,0.00004473402,0.000008983039,0.00001932599,0.00002140522,0.0005052765],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2210057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4514176,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06691524224776044,"score_gpt":0.2966559217332014,"score_spread":0.229740679485441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}