{"id":"W2003305533","doi":"10.1007/s003550200164","title":"A majorization comparison of apportionment methods in proportional representation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Apportionment; Rounding; Majorization; Divisor (algebraic geometry); Order (exchange); Representation (politics); Mathematics; Proportional representation; Combinatorics; Mathematical economics; Statistics; Economics; Computer science; Political science; Law; Politics; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000421269,0.00005275265,0.0002087837,0.00008133191,0.00008886987,0.0000128286,0.00003785867,0.00006137414,0.0003026641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008142253,0.0000625442,0.00003488665,0.0001634272,0.00003171607,0.00009494033,0.00001286887,0.00005934949,0.00001038841],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002738344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000015295,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001398423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001211289,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992229,0.0000464811,0.0004652565,0.0001511065,0.00002959808,0.00008460477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995609,0.00002604316,0.000326683,0.00005509043,0.00001417214,0.00001709684],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003804461,0.00010051,0.7572579,0.00005118283,0.00001261542,1.710445e-7,0.003382859,0.00003119683,0.00005389437,0.2329317,0.0001140884,0.006059997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006167844,0.0000516544,0.9571946,0.00001738113,0.000007204992,6.519974e-7,0.002026319,0.003255343,0.0002181266,0.02637296,0.01007313,0.0001658439],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9691514,0.001020406,0.009523164,0.002009184,0.0002751224,0.0003245286,0.00003696818,0.00002700764,0.01763217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991669,0.00001133547,0.0004120591,0.00001683925,0.00007325394,0.0000161713,0.00001775947,0.000005536067,0.0002801631],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2065587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3313959,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1139032161304582,"score_gpt":0.3617299188316292,"score_spread":0.247826702701171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}