{"id":"W2003305533","doi":"10.1007/s003550200164","title":"A majorization comparison of apportionment methods in proportional representation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Apportionment; Rounding; Majorization; Divisor (algebraic geometry); Order (exchange); Representation (politics); Mathematics; Proportional representation; Combinatorics; Mathematical economics; Statistics; Economics; Computer science; Political science; Law; Politics; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03113395,0.001017925,0.001948203,0.002010555,0.001353711,0.003544337,0.00468824,0.00207065,0.014538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08816769,0.0007319702,0.002093865,0.002372881,0.002663217,0.008457231,0.004422941,0.003425176,0.001531503],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002344597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002572664,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00149485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001509769,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9814011,0.01401786,0.0005546409,0.001155637,0.002017875,0.0008527507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92809,0.05494202,0.001116136,0.01112793,0.003932685,0.0007913304],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001557437,0.0003148846,0.001387968,0.0002373276,0.0001579359,0.00002626094,0.0008532336,0.02394461,0.001001588,0.6661164,0.005773796,0.2986285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002648603,0.0006649742,0.001496676,0.0001506737,0.0001972627,0.0001869021,0.0003709942,0.3781532,0.00303091,0.6016248,0.01379125,0.00006736008],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04692985,0.001378304,0.9329785,0.001448762,0.0002926995,0.0002795724,0.0001212577,0.0003692961,0.01620176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5026545,0.001554808,0.4661781,0.0008812068,0.0005172272,0.0008921883,0.000398007,0.0007458804,0.026178],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03113395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.164654,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1139032161304582,"score_gpt":0.3617299188316292,"score_spread":0.247826702701171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}