{"id":"W2003323434","doi":"10.1016/j.joep.2013.05.010","title":"Consumption benefits and gambling: Evidence from the NCAA basketball betting market","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Psychology","topic":"Sports Analytics and Performance","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Basketball; CONTEST; Consumption (sociology); Closeness; Economics; Advertising; Action (physics); Quality (philosophy); Microeconomics; Marketing; Actuarial science; Business; Sociology; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001120954,0.0001192969,0.000365475,0.0001285525,0.00008312886,0.0001138724,0.0003009135,0.00009481531,0.004473965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009075871,0.0001004744,0.0001007421,0.00003697444,0.00008842726,0.0004754177,0.00004273411,0.0002401556,0.0004169168],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005150392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001680023,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002386634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004128411,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986036,0.00001775562,0.0009233929,0.00023069,0.00002111993,0.0002034431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982251,0.0003002994,0.001089385,0.000258579,0.00003757389,0.00008909947],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003145474,0.00001916653,0.9619635,0.000005167922,0.00009256072,0.000002149406,0.000189995,0.0001912463,0.00002030012,0.003299814,0.02556181,0.008622774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005018563,0.00008375028,0.958636,0.00006850494,0.00001356198,0.00006716749,0.0000325394,0.006908291,0.00000685268,0.009672879,0.02386613,0.0001423991],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9774713,0.01308135,0.0002126698,0.005417626,0.00114526,0.00008535035,0.00002371998,0.000004134574,0.002558602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849512,0.01226539,0.0004767179,0.00158015,0.0005341776,0.000003389453,0.000001326851,0.00001305099,0.0001745889],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008480375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964361,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1279096283446593,"score_gpt":0.3033886712610961,"score_spread":0.1754790429164368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}