{"id":"W2003351827","doi":"10.1515/hf.2005.019","title":"Quantitative 1H NMR analysis of alkaline polysulfide solutions","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Holzforschung","topic":"Insect Pheromone Research and Control","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Division of Graduate Education; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; McGill University; University of Arizona","keywords":"Polysulfide; Chemistry; Reagent; Aqueous solution; Quantitative analysis (chemistry); Sodium hydroxide; Hydroxide; Inorganic chemistry; Organic chemistry; Chromatography; Physical chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003157838,0.00009135105,0.000237949,0.0000538195,0.000157596,0.00002150462,0.0001928222,0.0000520519,0.001189254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009087046,0.00003578339,0.0002462123,0.001177358,0.00006671572,0.0001445902,0.00004827826,0.00009587985,0.00007777815],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002235659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001103425,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001302645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009525072,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989124,0.00008088249,0.000229101,0.0001771455,0.0002518831,0.0003486082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994217,0.0002099617,0.00008167968,0.00006579665,0.0001158332,0.0001050878],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008948524,0.0001710742,0.002310564,0.000002346126,0.0004979592,0.000002334308,0.000116665,0.0004491993,0.945068,0.007144554,0.0006422582,0.04350555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001438894,0.002483347,0.7525076,0.00005421713,0.001765184,0.000008414616,0.002794945,0.1343948,0.07714624,0.00171484,0.02452601,0.001165496],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954534,0.0006823936,0.0001258809,0.001370701,0.00001383727,0.0001067857,0.0001060673,0.00003325265,0.00210767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986936,0.00008454327,0.0003795201,0.0001233893,0.0001074717,0.0000123273,0.0000813307,5.969574e-7,0.0005172553],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8679218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997238,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0377438065935185,"score_gpt":0.2763042190063643,"score_spread":0.2385604124128458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}