{"id":"W2003472190","doi":"10.1108/09513571211263211","title":"Metaphor in Nortel's letters to shareholders 1997‐2006","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Corporation; Shareholder; Originality; Meaning (existential); Value (mathematics); Business; Public relations; Psychology; Accounting; Sociology; Political science; Qualitative research; Linguistics; Social science; Computer science; Finance; Corporate governance; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006054671,0.0004735621,0.0005996532,0.0006278598,0.0004938642,0.0004380206,0.0006491594,0.0002242167,0.004301434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001147332,0.000453953,0.0003307379,0.0009765701,0.0001107299,0.001589621,0.000153098,0.001332569,0.001234515],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000454365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007303458,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001112991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003840948,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951511,0.0004461126,0.001223116,0.0006493486,0.0008083898,0.001721917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975228,0.0005306661,0.0006708844,0.0006370033,0.0002626371,0.0003759987],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001744668,0.0007041148,0.9182403,0.00006010455,0.0002094428,0.00007775636,0.01785459,0.00005262541,0.004251824,0.0001728403,0.02690328,0.03129863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001704149,0.00007005186,0.9556511,0.0002193989,0.0001998497,0.0007959677,0.01934248,0.00001721996,0.0005803634,0.0004709837,0.01993319,0.001015223],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9881575,0.0006627495,0.0007718473,0.0009589036,0.003482006,0.0004153109,0.00006150371,0.0001454361,0.005344715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893979,0.000008154992,0.001132355,0.005702799,0.003445846,0.00008276318,0.00003928133,0.00008359845,0.0001073428],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03741081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997912,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02890868705522271,"score_gpt":0.308898364578979,"score_spread":0.2799896775237563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}