{"id":"W2003674295","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.1.39","title":"FEDERAL JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS: A LOOK AT PATRONAGE IN FEDERAL APPOINTMENTS SINCE 1988","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Political science; Politics; Supreme court; Law; Judicial independence; Government (linguistics); Independence (probability theory); Power (physics); Judicial review; Corporate governance; Public administration; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003988073,0.00007638217,0.0002812875,0.002759666,0.005299838,0.002129517,0.000981819,0.001270021,0.005977689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0163448,0.0002125154,0.0002386377,0.00363408,0.002077504,0.001275426,0.001712751,0.001866662,0.0004989145],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007248946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00403576,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1743888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3130488,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9946866,0.001080658,0.0002174083,0.000398495,0.0008637845,0.002753056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866807,0.00374356,0.004934586,0.0003761731,0.001445796,0.002819233],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003475707,0.0002899819,0.6629323,0.00017667,0.00003654641,0.001783821,0.1691641,0.0005599018,0.001562202,0.04556296,0.01220267,0.1053812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008495594,0.00008466175,0.9386587,0.0000925736,0.0000102498,0.0003317465,0.02267756,0.0001907427,0.0002232977,0.0006834017,0.03701084,0.00002764679],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9753372,0.00138039,0.0003221666,0.004346101,0.00005944679,0.00001679855,0.0001691069,0.0000147485,0.01835413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948324,0.0002784016,0.00006807069,0.0002198227,0.00006183773,0.000007586187,0.00006355618,0.000005370405,0.004462962],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9927511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3467475,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01858306994758652,"score_gpt":0.2362304961876446,"score_spread":0.2176474262400581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}