{"id":"W2003728007","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2010.01.006","title":"Public participation in strategic environmental assessment (SEA): Critical review and the Quebec (Canada) approach","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":107,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa; Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Public participation; Strategic environmental assessment; Environmental planning; Process (computing); Environmental impact assessment; Hazardous waste; Agriculture; Environmental resource management; Political science; Public policy; Business; Public administration; Engineering; Geography; Environmental science; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002138093,0.0008011649,0.001184177,0.00004928037,0.0004998264,0.0001799176,0.0007152995,0.0001770567,0.01396076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008110346,0.0005601824,0.0003177529,0.0003214326,0.001774541,0.001060976,0.0007220247,0.001406054,0.0001102036],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00254051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002310428,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04258805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0672984,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9940274,0.0009954444,0.001196618,0.0009692544,0.001662677,0.001148633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997604,0.0003353083,0.0004131504,0.0009321891,0.000002927631,0.000712479],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003835671,0.003818247,0.9610416,0.001746988,0.0002504461,0.00006538219,0.0001699842,0.00004586648,0.003904851,0.002725969,0.006947091,0.01924522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001636491,0.0001147713,0.9905559,0.0004246476,0.0004652592,0.00005997132,0.0001992306,0.0007869774,0.00001555605,0.0004542725,0.004449148,0.000837718],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8833482,0.04769269,0.0001906482,0.02089815,0.0005307535,0.00767798,0.0002810108,0.0000945917,0.03928595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.930559,0.06146873,0.0007745849,0.005792602,0.00006334238,0.0006495288,0.0003218702,0.00006399203,0.0003063364],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04721079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999685,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03392083458791019,"score_gpt":0.3430195457179011,"score_spread":0.3090987111299909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}